The Rampur constituency witnessed an interesting fight in the 2023 assembly election. The voters exercised their voting franchise and 79.36% of voting was recorded in this constituency..
Phool Singh Rathiya of the Indian National Congress won the seat by defeating Nankiram Kanwar of the Bharatiya Janata Party with a margin of 22859 votes. For all breaking news, trends, and analysis, stay tuned.
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Phool Singh Rathiya
Winner
|
Indian National Congress |
93,647
Lead: 22,859
|
53.11% |
| Nankiram Kanwar | Bharatiya Janata Party | 70,788 | 40.14% |
| Jagat Ram Rathiya | Bahujan Samaj Party | 2,591 | 1.47% |
| Balmukund Rathiya | Janta Congress Chhattisgarh (J) | 2,574 | 1.46% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 2,497 | 1.42% |
| Ramdyal Uranw | Independent | 1,307 | 0.74% |
| Bireshwar Kanwar | Independent | 1,043 | 0.59% |
| Alexander Toppo | Johar Chhattisgarh Party | 658 | 0.37% |
| Dhanwar Vedlal Vanwasi | Independent | 647 | 0.37% |
| Kanhaiya Anand Kanwar | Hamar Raj Party | 584 | 0.33% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanki Ram Kanwar
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
65,048
Lead: 18,175
|
39% |
| Phool Singh Rathiya | Janta Congress Chhattisgarh (J) | 46,873 | 28% |
| Shyam Lal Kanwar | Indian National Congress | 44,261 | 26% |
| None Of The Above | 4,609 | 3% | |
| Chandrabhushan Kanwar Adhiwakta Llm | Ambedkarite Party Of India | 2,451 | 1% |
| Ramdayal Uraon | Independent | 1,842 | 1% |
| Tulsi Ram Khairwar | Independent | 1,525 | 1% |
| Dilip Singh Kanwar | Adhikar Vikas Party | 1,407 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Shyam Lal Kanwar
Winner
|
Indian National Congress |
67,868
Lead: 9,915
|
45% |
| Nanki Ram Kanwar | Bharatiya Janta Party | 57,953 | 38% |
| Bhuwaneshwar Singh Rathia | Independent | 21,125 | 14% |
| Ku. Hem Bai Kanwar | Bahujan Samaj Party | 2,586 | 2% |
| Narayan Majhwar | Chattisgarh Swabhiman Manch | 1,235 | 1% |
| Ramdayal Uraon | Samajwadi Party | 1,164 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nankiram Kanwar
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janta Party |
58,415
Lead: 8,321
|
46% |
| Pyarelal Kanwar | Indian National Congress | 50,094 | 39% |
| Sukhsingh Rathiya | Bahujan Samaj Party | 5,881 | 5% |
| Ramdayal Uraon | Independent | 4,892 | 4% |
| Mangalsingh Kanwar | Independent | 1,981 | 2% |
| Ambikadevi Maravi | Gondvana Gantantra Party | 1,324 | 1% |
| Harnarayan Tekam | Rashtriya Gondvana Party | 1,101 | 1% |
| Narayan Singh Manjhwar | Chhattisgarh Vikas Party | 1,056 | 1% |
| Ravikant Maravi | Shiv Sena | 895 | 1% |
| Sonkunwar Kanwar | Samajwadi Party | 756 | 1% |
| Dr. Lata Markam | Republican Party Of India (a) | 700 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanki Ram
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janta Party |
35,642
Lead: 380
|
34% |
| Pyare Lal | Indian National Congress | 35,262 | 34% |
| Durga Prasad Rathiya | Independent | 16,463 | 16% |
| Budhwar Singh | Independent | 4,391 | 4% |
| Shyamlal Kanwar | Bahujan Samaj Party | 4,361 | 4% |
| D.l. Markam | Nationalist Congress Party | 3,950 | 4% |
| Hemlata | Yuva Gantantra Party | 1,380 | 1% |
| Sonkunwar | Samajwadi Party | 995 | 1% |
| Kalyan Singh Tanwar | Independent | 979 | 1% |
| Mahettar Singh Korram | Gondvana Gantantra Party | 728 | 1% |
| Ku. Lata Singh | Republican Party Of India (a) | 575 | 1% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Lead | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Phool Singh Rathiya | INC | 93,647 | 22,859 | 53.11% |
| 2018 | Nanki Ram Kanwar | BJP | 65,048 | 18,175 | 39% |
| 2013 | Shyam Lal Kanwar | INC | 67,868 | 9,915 | 45% |
| 2008 | Nankiram Kanwar | BJP | 58,415 | 8,321 | 46% |
| 2003 | Nanki Ram | BJP | 35,642 | 380 | 34% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Phool Singh Rathiya | INC |
93,647
(Lead: 22,859)
|
53.11% |
| Nankiram Kanwar | BJP | 70,788 | 40.14% | |
| 2018 | Nanki Ram Kanwar | BJP |
65,048
(Lead: 18,175)
|
39% |
| Phool Singh Rathiya | JCC(J) | 46,873 | 28% | |
| 2013 | Shyam Lal Kanwar | INC |
67,868
(Lead: 9,915)
|
45% |
| Nanki Ram Kanwar | BJP | 57,953 | 38% | |
| 2008 | Nankiram Kanwar | BJP |
58,415
(Lead: 8,321)
|
46% |
| Pyarelal Kanwar | INC | 50,094 | 39% | |
| 2003 | Nanki Ram | BJP |
35,642
(Lead: 380)
|
34% |
| Pyare Lal | INC | 35,262 | 34% |
All 90 Assembly Constituencies in Chhattisgarh
Phool Singh Rathiya of the Indian National Congress (INC) won the Rampur Assembly seat in the 2023 elections, defeating Nankiram Kanwar of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) by a margin of 22859 votes.
The strike rate in the Rampur constituency is 60% BJP and 40% INC, with BJP won 3 times and INC won 2 times since the 2003 elections.
Phool Singh Rathiya (INC) received 53.11% vote share.
Nankiram Kanwar (BJP) received 40.14% vote share.
Phool Singh Rathiya (INC) won the 2023 election with 93647 votes, leading by 22859 votes and securing a 53.11% vote share.
The Rampur Assembly constituency falls under the Rampur Lok Sabha constituency of Rampur district.
Phool Singh Rathiya (INC) won the Rampur Assembly seat in 2023 with a margin of 22859 votes over Nankiram Kanwar (BJP).
The Rampur Assembly constituency is part of the Rampur Lok Sabha constituency, which includes other areas like Suar, Chamraua, Bilaspur, Milak (sc).
The top candidates in the Rampur Assembly Election 2023 were:
Phool Singh Rathiya (INC)
Nankiram Kanwar (BJP)
Jagat Ram Rathiya (BSP)
These candidates were the main contenders for the seat, with Phool Singh Rathiya (INC) emerging as the winner.
The voter turnout in the Rampur Assembly Election 2023 was 79.36%
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.