The Surat Lok Sabha Constituency in Gujarat is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence on Indian politics. Surat reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Gujarat. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates listed in the Surat Lok Sabha Constituency, Mukeshbhai Chandrakant Dalal from the Bharatiya Janata Party and Nilesh Kumbhani from the Indian National Congress were the prominent candidates. Following the rejection of the Congress candidate's nomination, Mukesh Dalal was announced as the uncontested winner of the Lok Sabha seat. This occurred as the remaining eight nominees withdrew their candidacies individually. Among them, four were Independent candidates, three represented lesser-known political parties, and one was from the Bahujan Samaj Party. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Surat Lok Sabha elections.
Bharatiya Janta Party
Indian National Congress
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mukeshbhai Chandrakant Dalal
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
-
Lead: 0
|
NAN% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surat City East |
Arvindbhai Rana
BJP
|
73,142 | 52.45% |
| Surat City North |
Kantibhai Ballar
BJP
|
57,117 | 59.10% |
| Karanj |
Pravinbhai Ghoghari
BJP
|
60,493 | 67.67% |
| Varachha Road |
Kishorbhai Kanani
BJP
|
67,206 | 55.13% |
| Olpad |
Mukeshbhai Patel
BJP
|
172,424 | 58.39% |
| Surat City West |
Purneshbhai Modi
BJP
|
122,981 | 75.73% |
| Katargam |
Vinodbhai Mordiya
BJP
|
120,505 | 58.25% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Darshana Vikram Jardosh | BJP |
795,651
(Lead:
548,230)
|
74% |
| Ashok Patel (adhevada) | INC | 247,421 | 23% | |
| 2014 | Darshana Vikram Jardosh | BJP |
718,412
(Lead:
533,190)
|
77% |
| Desai Naishadhbhai Bhupatbhai | INC | 185,222 | 20% | |
| 2009 | Shrimati Darshana Vikram Jardosh | BJP |
364,947
(Lead:
74,798)
|
52% |
| Gajera Dhirubhai Haribhai | INC | 290,149 | 42% | |
| 2004 | Kashiram Rana | BJP |
508,076
(Lead:
150,563)
|
57% |
| Chandravadan Chhotubhai Pithawala | INC | 357,513 | 40% | |
| 1999 | Kashiram Rana | BJP |
423,773
(Lead:
249,197)
|
69% |
| Rupin Rameshchandra Patchigar | INC | 174,576 | 28% | |
| 1998 | Kashiram Rana | BJP |
564,601
(Lead:
304,022)
|
65% |
| Thakorbhai Naik | INC | 260,579 | 30% | |
| 1996 | Kashiram Rana | BJP |
376,933
(Lead:
175,261)
|
61% |
| Kotadia Manubhai | INC | 201,672 | 33% | |
| 1991 | Kashiram Rana | BJP |
336,285
(Lead:
106,354)
|
56% |
| Chaudhary Sahdev Bherabhai | INC | 229,931 | 38% | |
| 1989 | Kashiram Rana | BJP |
428,465
(Lead:
194,041)
|
63% |
| C.d.patel | INC | 234,424 | 34% | |
| 1984 | Patel Chhaganbhai Devabhai | INC |
286,928
(Lead:
50,675)
|
54% |
| Rana Kashiram Chhabildas | BJP | 236,253 | 44% | |
| 1980 | Patel Chhaganbhai Devabhai | INC(I) |
234,263
(Lead:
26,661)
|
51% |
| Ashok Ranjitram Mehta | JNP | 207,602 | 45% | |
| 1977 | Desai Morarji Ranchhodji | BLD |
206,206
(Lead:
21,460)
|
52% |
| Chauhan Jashvantsingh Dan Singh | INC | 184,746 | 47% | |
| 1971 | Morarji Ranchhodji Desai | NCO |
170,321
(Lead:
31,524)
|
53% |
| Gordhandas Ranchhoddas Chokhawala | INC | 138,797 | 44% | |
| 1967 | M.r. Desai | INC |
163,836
(Lead:
122,908)
|
66% |
| J.d. Chauhan | IND | 40,928 | 16% | |
| 1962 | Morarji Ranchhodji Desai | INC |
165,225
(Lead:
99,031)
|
69% |
| Jaswantsinh Dansinh Chauhan | IND | 66,194 | 28% |
Mukeshbhai Chandrakant Dalal from BJP, is the MP of Surat.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.