For this constituency, the election was successfully held on May 7th. The voter turnout was 58.53 percent.Firozabad Lok Sabha Constituency in Uttar Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Firozabad reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Uttar Pradesh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Firozabad Lok Sabha Constituency, Akshay Yadav from Samajwadi Party , Chaudhary Bashir from Bahujan Samaj Party and Vishwadeep Singh from Bharatiya Janta Party are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Firozabad Lok Sabha elections.
Samajwadi Party
Bahujan Samaj Party
Bharatiya Janta Party
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Akshay Yadav
Winner
|
Samajwadi Party |
5,43,037
Lead: 89,312
|
49.04% |
| Vishwadeep Singh | Bharatiya Janata Party | 4,53,725 | 40.98% |
| Chaudhary Bashir | Bahujan Samaj Party | 90,948 | 8.21% |
| Upendra Singh | Bharatiya Kisan Parivartan Party | 7,119 | 0.64% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 5,279 | 0.48% |
| Rashmi Kant | Parivartan Samaj Party | 2,930 | 0.26% |
| Prem Dutt | Rashtra Uday Party | 2,878 | 0.26% |
| Rajveer | Independent | 1,380 | 0.12% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sirsaganj |
Sarvesh Singh
SP
|
96,224 | 46.22% |
| Firozabad |
Manish Asija
BJP
|
112,509 | 43.43% |
| Shikohabad |
Mukesh Verma
SP
|
106,279 | 45.14% |
| Jasrana |
Sachin Yadav
SP
|
108,289 | 43.71% |
| Tundla |
Prempal Singh Dhangar
BJP
|
122,881 | 49.46% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Akshay Yadav | SP |
543,037
(Lead:
89,312)
|
49% |
| Vishwadeep Singh | BJP | 453,725 | 41% | |
| 2019 | Dr. Chandra Sen Jadon | BJP |
495,819
(Lead:
28,781)
|
46% |
| Akshay Yadav | SP | 467,038 | 43% | |
| 2014 | Akshay Yadav | SP |
534,583
(Lead:
114,059)
|
49% |
| Prof. S.p. Singh Baghel | BJP | 420,524 | 38% | |
| 2009 | Akhilesh Yadav | SP |
287,011
(Lead:
67,301)
|
42% |
| Prof. S.p. Singh Baghel | BSP | 219,710 | 32% | |
| 2004 | Ram Ji Lal Suman | SP |
212,383
(Lead:
54,788)
|
40% |
| Kishori Lal Mahaur | BJP | 157,595 | 30% | |
| 1999 | Ram Jilal Suman | SP |
289,459
(Lead:
83,368)
|
50% |
| Prabhu Dayal Katheriyar | BJP | 206,091 | 36% | |
| 1998 | Prabhu Dayal Katheria | BJP |
263,263
(Lead:
39,950)
|
45% |
| Ramji Lal Suman | SP | 223,313 | 38% | |
| 1996 | Prabhudayal Katheria | BJP |
211,332
(Lead:
67,032)
|
46% |
| Ramjilal Suman | SP | 144,300 | 32% | |
| 1991 | Prabhu Dayal Katheria | BJP |
130,375
(Lead:
1,332)
|
30% |
| Shiv Narayan Gautam | JD | 129,043 | 30% | |
| 1989 | Ramji Lal Suman | JD |
283,774
(Lead:
172,826)
|
66% |
| Ganga Ram | INC | 110,948 | 26% | |
| 1984 | Ganga Ram | INC |
161,079
(Lead:
63,502)
|
48% |
| Rajesh Kumar Singh | LKD | 97,577 | 29% | |
| 1980 | Rajesh Kumar Singh | IND |
110,208
(Lead:
22,086)
|
39% |
| Azad Kumar Kardam | INC(I) | 88,122 | 32% | |
| 1977 | Ramji Lal Suman | BLD |
232,679
(Lead:
156,764)
|
74% |
| Raja Ram Pipal | INC | 75,915 | 24% | |
| 1971 | Chhatrapati Ambesh | INC |
110,797
(Lead:
90,305)
|
68% |
| Shiv Charan Lal | BKD | 20,492 | 13% | |
| 1967 | S.c. Lal | SSP |
83,638
(Lead:
13,281)
|
35% |
| C. Ambesh | INC | 70,357 | 30% | |
| 1962 | Shambhu Nath Chaturvedi | INC |
64,145
(Lead:
13,239)
|
30% |
| Data Ram Gorakh | REP | 50,906 | 24% | |
| 1957 | Brij Raj Singh | IND |
104,637
(Lead:
22,915)
|
48% |
| Ch. Raghubir Singh | INC | 81,722 | 38% |
Akshay Yadav from SP, is the MP of Firozabad.
The polling percentage for Firozabad in 2024 was 58.53 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.