For this constituency, the election was successfully held on May 13th. The voter turnout was 72.76 percent.Dhar Lok Sabha Constituency in Madhya Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Dhar reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Madhya Pradesh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Dhar Lok Sabha Constituency, Smt. Savitri Thakur from Bharatiya Janta Party and Radheshyam Muvel from Indian National Congress are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Dhar Lok Sabha elections.
Indian National Congress
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Smt. Savitri Thakur
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
7,94,449
Lead: 2,18,665
|
55.75% |
| Radheshyam Muvel | Indian National Congress | 5,75,784 | 40.4% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 15,651 | 1.1% |
| Dhumsingh Mandloi Machhar | Bahujan Samaj Party | 14,956 | 1.05% |
| Jitendra Muniya | Bharat Adivasi Party | 10,621 | 0.75% |
| Sunil Ajrawat | Independent | 5,408 | 0.38% |
| Shivaji Patel Kalmi | Independent | 4,700 | 0.33% |
| Vikram Vasuniya | Janata Congress | 3,475 | 0.24% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manawar |
Dr. Hiralal Alawa
INC
|
90,229 | 47.87% |
| Dhar |
Smt. Neena Vikram Verma
BJP
|
90,371 | 44.08% |
| Dharampuri |
Kalu Singh Thakur
BJP
|
84,207 | 47.76% |
| Sardarpur |
Pratap Grewal
INC
|
86,114 | 49.35% |
| Badnawar |
Bhawarsingh Shekhawat
INC
|
93,733 | 49.79% |
| Kukshi |
Surendra Singh Baghel Honey
INC
|
114,464 | 61.32% |
| Gandhwani |
Umang Singhar
INC
|
98,982 | 54.01% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Smt. Savitri Thakur | BJP |
794,449
(Lead:
218,665)
|
56% |
| Radheshyam Muvel | INC | 575,784 | 40% | |
| 2019 | Chattarsingh Darbar | BJP |
722,147
(Lead:
156,029)
|
54% |
| Girwal Dinesh | INC | 566,118 | 42% | |
| 2014 | Savitri Thakur | BJP |
558,387
(Lead:
104,328)
|
53% |
| Umang Singhar | INC | 454,059 | 43% | |
| 2009 | Gajendra Singh Rajukhedi | INC |
302,660
(Lead:
2,661)
|
46% |
| Mukam Singh Kirade | BJP | 299,999 | 46% | |
| 2004 | Chhatar Singh Darbar | BJP |
345,468
(Lead:
32,611)
|
49% |
| Umang Singhar | INC | 312,857 | 44% | |
| 1999 | Gajendra Singh Rajukhedi | INC |
355,482
(Lead:
34,105)
|
52% |
| Harsh Chouhan | BJP | 321,377 | 47% | |
| 1998 | Gajendra Singh Rajukhedi | INC |
344,858
(Lead:
21,093)
|
51% |
| Hemlata Chhatar Singh Darbar | BJP | 323,765 | 48% | |
| 1996 | Chhatar Sinh Darbar | BJP |
298,741
(Lead:
81,611)
|
51% |
| Surajbhanu Shivbhanu Solanki | INC | 217,130 | 37% | |
| 1991 | Surajbhanu Solanki | INC |
243,385
(Lead:
39,479)
|
53% |
| Dhirendrasingh Chouhan | BJP | 203,906 | 44% | |
| 1989 | Suraj Bhanu Shiv Bhanu Solanki | INC |
235,912
(Lead:
11,771)
|
47% |
| Umarao Singh Parwat Singh | BJP | 224,141 | 45% | |
| 1984 | Pratapsingh Baghel | INC |
264,577
(Lead:
135,355)
|
64% |
| Dheerendrasingh Lachhamansingh | BJP | 129,222 | 31% | |
| 1980 | Fatehbhanusinh S/o Ramsinh | INC(I) |
182,764
(Lead:
62,646)
|
55% |
| Bharatsinh S/o Gulabsinh | JNP | 120,118 | 36% | |
| 1977 | Bharat Singh Gulab Singh | BLD |
170,110
(Lead:
45,374)
|
58% |
| Mangilal Adiwasi | INC | 124,736 | 42% | |
| 1971 | Bharatsingh | BJS |
117,437
(Lead:
20,621)
|
53% |
| Fatebhanusingh | INC | 96,816 | 43% | |
| 1967 | Bharatsingh | BJS |
133,435
(Lead:
20,510)
|
54% |
| Jamunadevi | INC | 112,925 | 46% |
Smt. Savitri Thakur from BJP, is the MP of Dhar.
The polling percentage for Dhar in 2024 was 72.76 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.