Indas is a key legislative assembly constituency in West Bengal, located in the Bankura district. In the 2021 assembly elections, the seat was won by Bharatiya Janata Party. Nirmal Dhara, from Bharatiya Janata Party defeated Runu Mete of the All India Trinamool Congress by a margin of 7220 votes.
From election campaigns to final results, follow all developments related to Indas assembly constituency, including winner details, vote margins, and more on our dedicated page.
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nirmal Dhara
WINNER
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
104,936
Lead: 7,220
|
48% |
| Runu Mete | All India Trinamool Congress | 97,716 | 45% |
| Nayan Kumar Shill (bagdi) | Communist Party of India (Marxist) | 12,619 | 6% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 3,182 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gurupada Mete
WINNER
|
All India Trinamool Congress |
94,940
Lead: 18,837
|
48% |
| Dilip Kumar Malik | Communist Party Of India (marxist) | 76,103 | 39% |
| Nirmal Kumar Dhara | Bharatiya Janata Party | 16,246 | 8% |
| Basudeb Diger | Independent | 3,837 | 2% |
| None Of The Above | Nota | 3,670 | 2% |
| Bhairab Lohar | Bahujan Samaj Party | 2,409 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mahadeb Patra
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
86,056
Lead: 51,565
|
64% |
| Digar Basudeb | All India Trinamool Congress | 34,491 | 26% |
| Subhash Majhi | Indian National Congress | 13,806 | 10% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanda Dulal Majhi
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
78,213
Lead: 40,987
|
62% |
| Purnima Lohar | All India Trinamool Congress | 37,226 | 30% |
| Diger Basudeb | Bharatiya Janata Party | 10,101 | 8% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nandadulal Majhi
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
76,851
Lead: 50,893
|
62% |
| Naba Kumar Rajak | Indian National Congress | 25,958 | 21% |
| Diger Basudeb | Bharatiya Janata Party | 18,761 | 15% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanda Dulal Majhi
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
67,176
Lead: 39,390
|
63% |
| Sanatan Santra | Indian National Congress | 27,786 | 26% |
| Trapada Mete | Bharatiya Janata Party | 10,357 | 10% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Badan Bora
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
57,805
Lead: 25,499
|
62% |
| Piru Chandra Pandit | Indian National Congress | 32,306 | 35% |
| Raha Tulshi Chandan | Independent | 1,170 | 1% |
| Mukta Hari Bagdi | Independent | 732 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Badan Bora
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
45,133
Lead: 13,300
|
57% |
| Gour Ch. Lohar | Indian National Congress | 31,833 | 40% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Badan Bora
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
27,887
Lead: 19,038
|
62% |
| Nabadurga | Janta Party | 8,849 | 20% |
| Sanatan Santra | Indian National Congress | 7,433 | 17% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Votes | Lead | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Nirmal Dhara | BJP | 104,936 | 7,220 | 48% |
| 2016 | Gurupada Mete | AITC | 94,940 | 18,837 | 48% |
| 2006 | Mahadeb Patra | CPI(M) | 86,056 | 51,565 | 64% |
| 2001 | Nanda Dulal Majhi | CPM | 78,213 | 40,987 | 62% |
| 1996 | Nandadulal Majhi | CPM | 76,851 | 50,893 | 62% |
| 1991 | Nanda Dulal Majhi | CPM | 67,176 | 39,390 | 63% |
| 1987 | Badan Bora | CPM | 57,805 | 25,499 | 62% |
| 1982 | Badan Bora | CPM | 45,133 | 13,300 | 57% |
| 1977 | Badan Bora | CPM | 27,887 | 19,038 | 62% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Nirmal Dhara | BJP |
104,936
(Lead: 7,220)
|
48% |
| Runu Mete | AITC | 97,716 | 45% | |
| 2016 | Gurupada Mete | AITC |
94,940
(Lead: 18,837)
|
48% |
| Dilip Kumar Malik | CPM | 76,103 | 39% | |
| 2006 | Mahadeb Patra | CPI(M) |
86,056
(Lead: 51,565)
|
64% |
| Digar Basudeb | AITC | 34,491 | 26% | |
| 2001 | Nanda Dulal Majhi | CPM |
78,213
(Lead: 40,987)
|
62% |
| Purnima Lohar | AITC | 37,226 | 30% | |
| 1996 | Nandadulal Majhi | CPM |
76,851
(Lead: 50,893)
|
62% |
| Naba Kumar Rajak | INC | 25,958 | 21% | |
| 1991 | Nanda Dulal Majhi | CPM |
67,176
(Lead: 39,390)
|
63% |
| Sanatan Santra | INC | 27,786 | 26% | |
| 1987 | Badan Bora | CPM |
57,805
(Lead: 25,499)
|
62% |
| Piru Chandra Pandit | INC | 32,306 | 35% | |
| 1982 | Badan Bora | CPM |
45,133
(Lead: 13,300)
|
57% |
| Gour Ch. Lohar | INC | 31,833 | 40% | |
| 1977 | Badan Bora | CPM |
27,887
(Lead: 19,038)
|
62% |
| Nabadurga | JNP | 8,849 | 20% |
All 294 Assembly Constituencies in West Bengal
Nirmal Dhara of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won the Indas Assembly seat in the 2021 elections, defeating Runu Mete of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) by a margin of 7220 votes.
The strike rate in the Indas constituency is 75% CPM and 25% BJP, with CPM won 6 times and BJP won 1 time since the 1977 elections.
Nirmal Dhara (BJP) received 48.00% vote share.
Runu Mete (AITC) received 45.00% vote share.
Nirmal Dhara (BJP) won the 2021 election with 104936 votes, leading by 7220 votes and securing a 48.00% vote share.
The Indas Assembly constituency falls under the Lok Sabha constituency of district.
Nirmal Dhara (BJP) won the Indas Assembly seat in 2021 with a margin of 7220 votes over Runu Mete (AITC).
The top candidates in the Indas Assembly Election 2021 were:
Nirmal Dhara (BJP)
Runu Mete (AITC)
Nayan Kumar Shill (bagdi) (CPI(M))
These candidates were the main contenders for the seat, with Nirmal Dhara (BJP) emerging as the winner.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.