For this constituency, the election was successfully held on April 26th. The voter turnout was 56.93 percent.Aligarh Lok Sabha Constituency in Uttar Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Aligarh reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Uttar Pradesh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Aligarh Lok Sabha Constituency, Satish Gautam from Bharatiya Janta Party , Hitendra Kumar Alias Bunty Upadhyay from Bahujan Samaj Party and Brijendra Singh from Samajwadi Party are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Aligarh Lok Sabha elections.
Bharatiya Janta Party
Bahujan Samaj Party
Samajwadi Party
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Satish Gautam
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
5,01,834
Lead: 15,647
|
44.28% |
| Brijendra Singh | Samajwadi Party | 4,86,187 | 42.9% |
| Hitendra Kumar Alias Bunty Upadhyay | Bahujan Samaj Party | 1,23,929 | 10.93% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 4,934 | 0.44% |
| Gyani Ram | Independent | 3,799 | 0.34% |
| Satish Kumar | Independent | 3,561 | 0.31% |
| Satish Kumar | Swatantra Jantaraj Party | 1,648 | 0.15% |
| Manoj Kumar Alias Manoj Lodhi | Saman Adhikar Party | 1,440 | 0.13% |
| Keshav Dev Alias Pandit Keshav Dev Gautam | Independent | 1,319 | 0.12% |
| Surendra | Moulik Adhikar Party | 1,178 | 0.1% |
| Rajesh Kumar | Independent | 1,056 | 0.09% |
| Dileep Sharma Ad. | Independent | 955 | 0.08% |
| Mahesh Chandra Sharma | Independent | 736 | 0.06% |
| Raj Kumar | Rashtriya Shoshit Samaj Party | 412 | 0.04% |
| Manoj Kumar Sharma Advocate | Loktantrik Janshakti Party | 378 | 0.03% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Satish Gautam | BJP |
501,834
(Lead:
15,647)
|
44% |
| Brijendra Singh | SP | 486,187 | 43% | |
| 2019 | Satish Kumar Gautam | BJP |
656,215
(Lead:
229,261)
|
56% |
| Dr. Ajeet Baliyan | BSP | 426,954 | 37% | |
| 2014 | Satish Kumar | BJP |
514,622
(Lead:
286,736)
|
49% |
| Dr. Arvind Kumar Singh | BSP | 227,886 | 22% | |
| 2009 | Raj Kumari Chauhan | BSP |
193,444
(Lead:
16,557)
|
28% |
| Zafar Alam | SP | 176,887 | 26% | |
| 2004 | Bijendra Singh | INC |
167,142
(Lead:
2,791)
|
26% |
| Sheela Gautam | BJP | 164,351 | 26% | |
| 1999 | Sheela Gautam | BJP |
219,313
(Lead:
80,817)
|
40% |
| Sahab Singh | BSP | 138,496 | 25% | |
| 1998 | Sheela Gautam | BJP |
292,637
(Lead:
131,699)
|
48% |
| Captain Ku. Baldev Singh | SP | 160,938 | 26% | |
| 1996 | Sheela Gautam | BJP |
233,130
(Lead:
91,048)
|
47% |
| Abdul Khaliq | BSP | 142,082 | 28% | |
| 1991 | Shila Devi Gautam (w) | BJP |
177,161
(Lead:
12,475)
|
39% |
| Baldev Singh | JD | 164,686 | 36% | |
| 1989 | Satya Pal Malik | JD |
233,465
(Lead:
78,408)
|
51% |
| Usha Rani | INC | 155,057 | 34% | |
| 1984 | Usha Rani | INC |
216,329
(Lead:
102,231)
|
54% |
| Budhpriya Morya | LKD | 114,098 | 29% | |
| 1980 | Indra Kumari | JNP(S) |
128,353
(Lead:
17,978)
|
38% |
| Ghan Shyam Singh | INC(I) | 110,375 | 33% | |
| 1977 | Nawab Singh Chauhan | BLD |
280,811
(Lead:
190,758)
|
71% |
| Ghan Shyam Singh | INC | 90,053 | 23% | |
| 1971 | Shive Kumar Shastri | BKD |
160,198
(Lead:
35,881)
|
48% |
| Mohd. Younus Saleem | INC | 124,317 | 37% | |
| 1967 | S.k. Shastri | IND |
77,284
(Lead:
18,554)
|
28% |
| R.m. Pratap | IND | 58,730 | 21% | |
| 1962 | B. P. Maurya | REP |
73,571
(Lead:
3,025)
|
30% |
| Shiv Kumar | IND | 70,546 | 29% |
Satish Gautam from BJP, is the MP of Aligarh.
The polling percentage for Aligarh in 2024 was 56.93 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.