For this constituency, the election was successfully held on June 1st. The voter turnout was 60.26 percent.Maharajganj Lok Sabha Constituency in Uttar Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Maharajganj reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Uttar Pradesh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Maharajganj Lok Sabha Constituency, Pankaj Choudhary from Bharatiya Janta Party , Mohd. Mousame Aalam from Bahujan Samaj Party and Virendra Chaudhary from Indian National Congress are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Maharajganj Lok Sabha elections.
Bahujan Samaj Party
Indian National Congress
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pankaj Choudhary
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
5,91,310
Lead: 35,451
|
48.85% |
| Virendra Chaudhary | Indian National Congress | 5,55,859 | 45.92% |
| Mohd. Mousame Aalam | Bahujan Samaj Party | 32,955 | 2.72% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 9,745 | 0.81% |
| Brijesh | Abhay Samaj Party | 8,583 | 0.71% |
| Chhedi Majdoor | Independent | 3,834 | 0.32% |
| Ramprit | Independent | 3,029 | 0.25% |
| Sunil | Independent | 2,718 | 0.22% |
| Vinod Kumar Patel | Sardar Patel Siddhant Party | 2,418 | 0.2% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nautanwa |
Rishi
NISHAD
|
90,263 | 40.03% |
| Pharenda |
Virendra Chaudhary
INC
|
85,181 | 40.28% |
| Paniyara |
Gyanendra Singh
BJP
|
135,463 | 52.11% |
| Maharajganj |
Jaimangal Kanojiya
BJP
|
136,071 | 51.80% |
| Siswa |
Premsagar Patel
BJP
|
127,673 | 50.05% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Pankaj Choudhary | BJP |
591,310
(Lead:
35,451)
|
49% |
| Virendra Chaudhary | INC | 555,859 | 46% | |
| 2019 | Pankaj Choudhary | BJP |
726,349
(Lead:
340,424)
|
59% |
| Akhilesh | SP | 385,925 | 31% | |
| 2014 | Pankaj | BJP |
471,542
(Lead:
240,458)
|
45% |
| Kashi Nath Shukla | BSP | 231,084 | 22% | |
| 2009 | Harsh Vardhan | INC |
305,474
(Lead:
123,628)
|
36% |
| Ganesh Shanker Pandey | BSP | 181,846 | 22% | |
| 2004 | Pankaj Choudhary | BJP |
228,702
(Lead:
64,799)
|
31% |
| Akhilesh | SP | 163,903 | 22% | |
| 1999 | Akhilesh Singh | SP |
239,826
(Lead:
10,644)
|
35% |
| Pankaj Chaudhary | BJP | 229,182 | 34% | |
| 1998 | Pankaj Choudhari | BJP |
233,361
(Lead:
26,940)
|
36% |
| Akhilesh Singh | SP | 206,421 | 32% | |
| 1996 | Pankaj Chaudhary | BJP |
182,855
(Lead:
33,550)
|
30% |
| Harsh Vardhan | BSP | 149,305 | 25% | |
| 1991 | Pankaj Choudhari | BJP |
155,650
(Lead:
33,727)
|
32% |
| Jitendra Singh | INC | 121,923 | 25% | |
| 1989 | Harsh Vardhan | JD |
157,657
(Lead:
14,990)
|
32% |
| Jitender Singh | INC | 142,667 | 29% | |
| 1984 | Jitendra Singh | INC |
208,692
(Lead:
124,474)
|
47% |
| Hari Shanker Tiwari | IND | 84,218 | 19% | |
| 1980 | Ashfaq Husain | INC(I) |
133,088
(Lead:
23,536)
|
39% |
| Janardan Singh Azad | JNP(S) | 109,552 | 32% | |
| 1977 | Shibban Lal Saksena | BLD |
184,090
(Lead:
131,991)
|
62% |
| Raghubar Prasad | INC | 52,099 | 18% | |
| 1971 | Sibban Lal Saxena | IND |
93,252
(Lead:
39,418)
|
49% |
| Mahadeo Prasad | INC | 53,834 | 28% | |
| 1967 | M. Prasad | INC |
94,864
(Lead:
46,727)
|
40% |
| R. Ratan | BJS | 48,137 | 20% | |
| 1962 | Mahadeo Prasad | INC |
95,469
(Lead:
24,371)
|
53% |
| Shibban Lal Saxena | SOC | 71,098 | 39% |
Pankaj Choudhary from BJP, is the MP of Maharajganj.
The polling percentage for Maharajganj in 2024 was 60.26 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.