For this constituency, the election was successfully held on May 13th. The voter turnout was 62.54 percent.Sitapur Lok Sabha Constituency in Uttar Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Sitapur reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Uttar Pradesh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Sitapur Lok Sabha Constituency, Rakesh Rathore from Indian National Congress , Mahendra Singh Yadav from Bahujan Samaj Party and Rajesh Verma from Bharatiya Janta Party are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Sitapur Lok Sabha elections.
Indian National Congress
Bahujan Samaj Party
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rakesh Rathore
Winner
|
Indian National Congress |
5,31,138
Lead: 89,641
|
48.2% |
| Rajesh Verma | Bharatiya Janata Party | 4,41,497 | 40.06% |
| Mahendra Singh Yadav | Bahujan Samaj Party | 99,364 | 9.02% |
| Mo. Kashif Ansari | Apna Dal (kamerawadi) | 7,586 | 0.69% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 6,958 | 0.63% |
| Lekhraj Lodhi | Aazad Samaj Party (kanshi Ram) | 6,734 | 0.61% |
| Vidyawati Gautam | Independent | 4,194 | 0.38% |
| Chandra Shekhar Verma | Rashtriya Shoshit Samaj Party | 2,429 | 0.22% |
| Ram Adhar Verma | Sardar Patel Siddhant Party | 2,115 | 0.19% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sevata |
Gyan Tiwari
BJP
|
108,057 | 48.43% |
| Biswan |
Nirmal Verma
BJP
|
106,014 | 44.77% |
| Mahmoodabad |
Smt. Asha Maurya
BJP
|
92,091 | 41.89% |
| Sitapur |
Rakesh Rathore "guru"
BJP
|
99,349 | 42.72% |
| Laharpur |
Anil Verma
SP
|
112,987 | 47.05% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Rakesh Rathore | INC |
531,138
(Lead:
89,641)
|
48% |
| Rajesh Verma | BJP | 441,497 | 40% | |
| 2019 | Rajesh Verma | BJP |
514,528
(Lead:
100,833)
|
48% |
| Nakul Dubey | BSP | 413,695 | 39% | |
| 2014 | Rajesh Verma | BJP |
417,546
(Lead:
51,027)
|
41% |
| Kaiser Jahan | BSP | 366,519 | 36% | |
| 2009 | Kaisar Jahan | BSP |
241,106
(Lead:
19,632)
|
34% |
| Mahendra Singh Verma | SP | 221,474 | 31% | |
| 2004 | Rajesh Verma | BSP |
171,733
(Lead:
5,234)
|
29% |
| Mukhtar Anees | SP | 166,499 | 28% | |
| 1999 | Rajesh Verma | BSP |
211,120
(Lead:
36,362)
|
33% |
| Janardan Prasad Misra | BJP | 174,758 | 27% | |
| 1998 | Janardan Prasad Misra | BJP |
216,874
(Lead:
27,920)
|
33% |
| Prem Nath Varma | BSP | 188,954 | 29% | |
| 1996 | Mukhtar Anis | SP |
148,252
(Lead:
10,046)
|
30% |
| Janaradan Prasad Mishra | BJP | 138,206 | 28% | |
| 1991 | Janardan Prasad Misra | BJP |
134,569
(Lead:
37,706)
|
32% |
| Rajendra Kuumari Bajpai (w) | INC | 96,863 | 23% | |
| 1989 | Rajendra Kumari Bajpai | INC |
156,906
(Lead:
9,158)
|
35% |
| Shiv Sevak | JD | 147,748 | 33% | |
| 1984 | Rajendra Kumari | INC |
185,722
(Lead:
93,298)
|
50% |
| Hargovind Verma | LKD | 92,424 | 25% | |
| 1980 | Rajendra Kumari Bajpai | INC(I) |
121,211
(Lead:
45,697)
|
42% |
| Hargovind Verma | JNP(S) | 75,514 | 26% | |
| 1977 | Hargovind Verma | BLD |
194,400
(Lead:
109,975)
|
63% |
| Jagdish Chandra Dixit | INC | 84,425 | 27% | |
| 1971 | Jagdish Chandra Dixit | INC |
130,086
(Lead:
52,232)
|
57% |
| Jainarain Rathi | BJS | 77,854 | 34% | |
| 1967 | S. Nand | BJS |
102,742
(Lead:
26,074)
|
39% |
| Jagannath | INC | 76,668 | 29% | |
| 1962 | Suraj Lal | JS |
76,242
(Lead:
3,377)
|
36% |
| Dinesh Pratap Singh | INC | 72,865 | 34% |
Rakesh Rathore from INC, is the MP of Sitapur.
The polling percentage for Sitapur in 2024 was 62.54 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.