The Kangpokpi constituency witnessed an interesting fight in the 2022 assembly election. The voters exercised their voting franchise .
Smt. Nemcha Kipgen of the Bharatiya Janata Party won the seat by defeating Soshim Gurung of the Janata Dal (United) with a margin of 5396 votes.The Kangpokpi Assembly constituency falls under the Outer Manipur Lok Sabha constituency. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, Indian National Congress candidate Alfred Kanngam S. Arthur won the Outer Manipur Lok Sabha (MP) seat with a margin of 85418 votes, defeating Kachui Timothy Zimik of the Naga Peoples Front. For all breaking news, trends, and analysis, stay tuned.
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Smt. Nemcha Kipgen
WINNER
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
14,412
Lead: 5,396
|
57.37% |
| Soshim Gurung | Janata Dal (United) | 9,016 | 35.89% |
| Kipgen | Indian National Congress | 1,376 | 5.48% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 315 | 1.25% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nemcha Kipgen
WINNER
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
13,485
Lead: 2,297
|
51.74% |
| Kharga Tamang | Independent | 11,188 | 42.92% |
| Athikho Solomon Enah | Naga Peoples Front | 875 | 3.36% |
| None Of The Above | None Of The Above | 289 | 1.11% |
| Soshim Keishing | Nationalist Congress Party | 228 | 0.87% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mrs. Nemcha Kipgen
WINNER
|
Manipur State Congress Party |
6,639
Lead: 443
|
39% |
| Khadga Bahadur | All India Trinamool Congress | 6,196 | 36% |
| Haokholal Hangshing | Indian National Congress | 3,420 | 20% |
| Padam Kharel | Janata Dal (United) | 547 | 3% |
| Bhumi Prasad Basnet | Independent | 222 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Thangminlen Kipgen
WINNER
|
Nagaland Peoples Party |
8,693
Lead: 2,171
|
39% |
| Kishor Thapa | Independent | 6,522 | 29% |
| Haokholal Hangshing | Indian National Congress | 5,589 | 25% |
| S. Daphya | Independent | 1,495 | 7% |
| Tek Bahadur | Independent | 185 | 1% |
| S. Low | Independent | 96 | 0% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Thangminlen
WINNER
|
Federal Party Of Manipur |
9,265
Lead: 3,396
|
40% |
| Hari Prasad Nepal | Bharatiya Janata Party | 5,869 | 25% |
| V.l. Chongloi | Indian National Congress | 4,690 | 20% |
| Kishor Thapa | Samata Party | 2,276 | 10% |
| Achong | Nationalist Congress Party | 894 | 4% |
| S. Low | Independent | 66 | 0% |
| R. S. Daphya | Manipur State Congress Party | 54 | 0% |
| L. S. John | Naga National Party | 18 | 0% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Thangminlen Kipgen
WINNER
|
Nationalist Congress Party |
14,565
Lead: 9,133
|
63% |
| Ranjit Gurung | Indian National Congress | 5,432 | 23% |
| Hari Prasad Nepal | Bharatiya Janata Party | 3,010 | 13% |
| Kishore Thapa | Samata Party | 53 | 0% |
| Om Bahadur Cheetry | Janata Dal (United) | 22 | 0% |
| Vungkholal Chongloi | Federal Party Of Manipur | 21 | 0% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Thangminlen
WINNER
|
Mahabharat Peples Party |
9,134
Lead: 2,072
|
44% |
| Kishore Thapa | Samata Party | 7,062 | 34% |
| L.s. John | Indian National Congress | 4,011 | 19% |
| Solomon Veino | Independent | 308 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
L. S. John
WINNER
|
Janata Dal |
4,529
Lead: 27
|
24% |
| Shehkhogin Pagin Kipgen | Indian Congress (Socialist- Sarat Chandra Sinha) | 4,502 | 24% |
| Tongkhohao Hangshing | Mahabharat Peples Party | 3,770 | 20% |
| Kishore | Indian National Congress | 2,922 | 16% |
| Hari Prasad Nepal | Independent | 2,367 | 13% |
| Apao Chongloi | Independent | 311 | 2% |
| Ranjit Gurung | Manipur Hill Peoples Council | 83 | 0% |
| Purna Prasad Sedai | Independent | 31 | 0% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kishore Thapa
WINNER
|
Independent |
6,782
Lead: 3,096
|
42% |
| Thangkholet Kipgen | Independent | 3,686 | 23% |
| Seikam | Independent | 3,582 | 22% |
| Padma Prasad Kharel | Indian National Congress | 1,774 | 11% |
| Ranjit Gurung | Independent | 57 | 0% |
| R. K. Lungsubou | Independent | 49 | 0% |
| K. A. Ashi Shimray | Independent | 12 | 0% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kishore Thapa
WINNER
|
Indian National Congress (I) |
5,353
Lead: 2,120
|
47% |
| Taokhosli Kipgen | Independent | 3,233 | 28% |
| Paokhothang | Independent | 2,335 | 20% |
| Ram Prasad | Janta Party | 194 | 2% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Votes | Lead | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Smt. Nemcha Kipgen | BJP | 14,412 | 5,396 | 57.37% |
| 2017 | Nemcha Kipgen | BJP | 13,485 | 2,297 | 51.74% |
| 2012 | Mrs. Nemcha Kipgen | MSCP | 6,639 | 443 | 39% |
| 2007 | Thangminlen Kipgen | NPP | 8,693 | 2,171 | 39% |
| 2002 | Thangminlen | FPM | 9,265 | 3,396 | 40% |
| 2000 | Thangminlen Kipgen | NCP | 14,565 | 9,133 | 63% |
| 1995 | Thangminlen | MPP | 9,134 | 2,072 | 44% |
| 1990 | L. S. John | JD | 4,529 | 27 | 24% |
| 1984 | Kishore Thapa | IND | 6,782 | 3,096 | 42% |
| 1980 | Kishore Thapa | INC(I) | 5,353 | 2,120 | 47% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Smt. Nemcha Kipgen | BJP |
14,412
(Lead: 5,396)
|
57.37% |
| Soshim Gurung | JD(U) | 9,016 | 35.89% | |
| 2017 | Nemcha Kipgen | BJP |
13,485
(Lead: 2,297)
|
51.74% |
| Kharga Tamang | IND | 11,188 | 42.92% | |
| 2012 | Mrs. Nemcha Kipgen | MSCP |
6,639
(Lead: 443)
|
39% |
| Khadga Bahadur | TMC | 6,196 | 36% | |
| 2007 | Thangminlen Kipgen | NPP |
8,693
(Lead: 2,171)
|
39% |
| Kishor Thapa | IND | 6,522 | 29% | |
| 2002 | Thangminlen | FPM |
9,265
(Lead: 3,396)
|
40% |
| Hari Prasad Nepal | BJP | 5,869 | 25% | |
| 2000 | Thangminlen Kipgen | NCP |
14,565
(Lead: 9,133)
|
63% |
| Ranjit Gurung | INC | 5,432 | 23% | |
| 1995 | Thangminlen | MPP |
9,134
(Lead: 2,072)
|
44% |
| Kishore Thapa | SAP | 7,062 | 34% | |
| 1990 | L. S. John | JD |
4,529
(Lead: 27)
|
24% |
| Shehkhogin Pagin Kipgen | ICS(SCS) | 4,502 | 24% | |
| 1984 | Kishore Thapa | IND |
6,782
(Lead: 3,096)
|
42% |
| Thangkholet Kipgen | IND | 3,686 | 23% | |
| 1980 | Kishore Thapa | INC(I) |
5,353
(Lead: 2,120)
|
47% |
| Taokhosli Kipgen | IND | 3,233 | 28% |
All 60 Assembly Constituencies in Manipur
Smt. Nemcha Kipgen of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won the Kangpokpi Assembly seat in the 2022 elections, defeating Soshim Gurung of the Janata Dal (United) (JD(U)) by a margin of 5396 votes.
The strike rate in the Kangpokpi constituency is 67% BJP and 33% MSCP, with BJP won 2 times and MSCP won 1 time since the 1977 elections.
Smt. Nemcha Kipgen (BJP) received 57.37% vote share.
Soshim Gurung (JD(U)) received 35.89% vote share.
Smt. Nemcha Kipgen (BJP) won the 2022 election with 14412 votes, leading by 5396 votes and securing a 57.37% vote share.
The Kangpokpi Assembly constituency falls under the Outer Manipur Lok Sabha constituency of Senapati district.
Smt. Nemcha Kipgen (BJP) won the Kangpokpi Assembly seat in 2022 with a margin of 5396 votes over Soshim Gurung (JD(U)).
The Kangpokpi Assembly constituency is part of the Outer Manipur Lok Sabha constituency, which includes other areas like Heirok, Wangjing Tentha, Khangabo, Wabgai, Kakching, Hiyanglam, Sugnoo, Jiribam, Chandel, Tengnoupal, Phungyar, Ukhrul, Chingai, Saikul, Karong, Mao, Tadubi, Saitu, Tamei, Tamenglong, Nungba, Tipaimukh, Thanlon, Henglep, Churachandpur, Saikot, Singhat.
The top candidates in the Kangpokpi Assembly Election 2022 were:
Smt. Nemcha Kipgen (BJP)
Soshim Gurung (JD(U))
Kipgen (INC)
These candidates were the main contenders for the seat, with Smt. Nemcha Kipgen (BJP) emerging as the winner.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.