Betul Lok Sabha Constituency in Madhya Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Betul reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Madhya Pradesh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Betul Lok Sabha Constituency, Durga Das Uikey from Bharatiya Janta Party and Ramu Tekam from Indian National Congress are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Betul Lok Sabha elections.
Indian National Congress
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Durga Das Uikey
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
8,48,236
Lead: 3,79,761
|
60.76% |
| Ramu Tekam | Indian National Congress | 4,68,475 | 33.56% |
| Arjun Ashok Bhalavi | Bahujan Samaj Party | 26,597 | 1.91% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 20,322 | 1.46% |
| Anil Uikey | Bharat Adivasi Party | 10,576 | 0.76% |
| Bhurelal Chotelal Bethekar | Independent | 7,811 | 0.56% |
| Bhagcharan Warkade | Independent | 5,968 | 0.43% |
| Suner Uikey | Gondvana Gantantra Party | 4,186 | 0.3% |
| Barskar Subhash Koraku | Swatantra Kisan Party | 3,849 | 0.28% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ghoradongri |
Smt. Ganga Bai Uikey
BJP
|
103,710 | 47.38% |
| Bhainsdehi |
Mahendra Singh Chouhan
BJP
|
97,938 | 43.84% |
| Amla |
Dr. Yogesh Pandagre
BJP
|
86,726 | 51.40% |
| Harda |
Ram Kishore Dogne
INC
|
94,553 | 48.10% |
| Harsud |
Dr. Kunwar Vijay Shah
BJP
|
116,580 | 64.27% |
| Betul |
Hemant Vijay Khandelwal
BJP
|
109,183 | 51.85% |
| Timarni |
Abhijeet Shah
INC
|
76,554 | 47.41% |
| Multai |
Chandrashekhar Deshmukh
BJP
|
96,066 | 51.38% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Durga Das Uikey | BJP |
848,236
(Lead:
379,761)
|
61% |
| Ramu Tekam | INC | 468,475 | 34% | |
| 2019 | Durga Das (d.d.) Uikey | BJP |
811,248
(Lead:
360,241)
|
60% |
| Ramu Tekam (advocate) | INC | 451,007 | 33% | |
| 2014 | Jyoti Dhurve | BJP |
643,651
(Lead:
328,614)
|
63% |
| Ajay Shah Makrai | INC | 315,037 | 31% | |
| 2009 | Jyoti Dhurve | BJP |
334,939
(Lead:
97,317)
|
53% |
| Ojharam Evane | INC | 237,622 | 37% | |
| 2004 | Khandelwal Vijay Kumar (munni Bhaia) | BJP |
288,007
(Lead:
157,540)
|
53% |
| Rajendra Jaiswal | INC | 130,467 | 24% | |
| 1999 | Vijay Kumar Khandelwal Munni Bhaiya | BJP |
272,512
(Lead:
64,472)
|
51% |
| Gufran Bhai | INC | 208,040 | 39% | |
| 1998 | Vijay Kumar Khandelwal (munni Bhaiya) | BJP |
284,091
(Lead:
39,666)
|
51% |
| Dr. Ashok Sable | INC | 244,425 | 43% | |
| 1996 | Vijay Kumar Khandelwal | BJP |
260,259
(Lead:
112,076)
|
52% |
| Aslam Sherkhan | INC | 148,183 | 30% | |
| 1991 | Aslam-sher-khan | INC |
153,756
(Lead:
22,733)
|
52% |
| Arif Baig | BJP | 131,023 | 44% | |
| 1989 | Arif Beg | BJP |
194,266
(Lead:
40,772)
|
49% |
| Aslam Sherkhan | INC | 153,494 | 39% | |
| 1984 | Aslam Sherkhan | INC |
147,190
(Lead:
37,950)
|
47% |
| M. N. Buch | IND | 109,240 | 35% | |
| 1980 | Gufran Azam | INC(I) |
104,816
(Lead:
29,322)
|
42% |
| Subhashchandra Ahuja | JNP | 75,494 | 30% | |
| 1977 | Subhash Chandra Ahuja | BLD |
108,660
(Lead:
26,923)
|
49% |
| Narendra Kumar Salve | INC | 81,737 | 37% | |
| 1971 | Narendra Kuma Salve | INC |
143,918
(Lead:
68,091)
|
65% |
| Vasant Kumar Pandit | BJS | 75,827 | 35% | |
| 1967 | S.n. Kumar | INC |
102,661
(Lead:
13,899)
|
46% |
| R.s.d. Prasad | BJS | 88,762 | 40% | |
| 1952 | Bhikulal Lakhmichand Chandak | INC |
129,277
(Lead:
94,082)
|
60% |
| Gopal Namuji Deshmukh | IND | 35,195 | 16% |
Durga Das Uikey from BJP, is the MP of Betul.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.