For this constituency, the election was successfully held on April 19th. The voter turnout was 66.59 percent.Ganganagar Lok Sabha Constituency in Rajasthan is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Ganganagar reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Rajasthan. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Ganganagar Lok Sabha Constituency, Kuldeep Indora from Indian National Congress and Priyanka Balan from Bharatiya Janta Party are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Ganganagar Lok Sabha elections.
Indian National Congress
Bharatiya Janta Party
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kuldeep Indora
Winner
|
Indian National Congress |
7,26,492
Lead: 88,153
|
51.4% |
| Priyanka Balan | Bharatiya Janata Party | 6,38,339 | 45.16% |
| Devkaran Nayak | Bahujan Samaj Party | 16,302 | 1.15% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 13,095 | 0.93% |
| Rajkumar | Independent | 4,375 | 0.31% |
| Kulwant Kaur | Indian Peoples Green Party | 4,362 | 0.31% |
| Daya Ram | Independent | 3,719 | 0.26% |
| Rajender Kumar | Bhartiya Jan Samman Party | 2,443 | 0.17% |
| Kana Ram | Independent | 2,266 | 0.16% |
| Major Singh | Jai Hind Congress Party | 2,101 | 0.15% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raisinghnagar |
Sohan Lal Nayak
INC
|
79,586 | 37.08% |
| Pilibanga |
Vinod Gothwal
INC
|
143,091 | 57.84% |
| Sangaria |
Abhimanyu Poonia
INC
|
98,341 | 47.40% |
| Karanpur |
Rupinder Singh Kunnar
INC
|
94,950 | 48.55% |
| Sadulshahar |
Gurveer Singh Brar
BJP
|
74,433 | 37.58% |
| Ganganagar |
Jaideep Bihani
BJP
|
81,001 | 44.66% |
| Suratgarh |
Dungar Ram Gedar
INC
|
116,841 | 55.87% |
| Hanumangarh |
Ganeshraj Bansal
IND
|
89,323 | 37.03% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Kuldeep Indora | INC |
726,492
(Lead:
88,153)
|
51% |
| Priyanka Balan | BJP | 638,339 | 45% | |
| 2019 | Nihal Chand | BJP |
897,177
(Lead:
406,978)
|
62% |
| Bharat Ram Meghwal | INC | 490,199 | 34% | |
| 2014 | Nihalchand | BJP |
658,130
(Lead:
291,741)
|
53% |
| Master Bhanwarlal Meghwal | INC | 366,389 | 29% | |
| 2009 | Bharat Ram Meghwal | INC |
476,554
(Lead:
140,668)
|
52% |
| Nihal Chand Meghwal | BJP | 335,886 | 37% | |
| 2004 | Nihalchand Meghwal | BJP |
331,475
(Lead:
7,393)
|
46% |
| Bharatram Meghwal | INC | 324,082 | 45% | |
| 1999 | Nihal Chand | BJP |
358,104
(Lead:
95,886)
|
54% |
| Er. Shankar Pannu | INC | 262,218 | 39% | |
| 1998 | Eng. Shankar Pannu | INC |
335,052
(Lead:
42,761)
|
47% |
| Nihal Chand | BJP | 292,291 | 41% | |
| 1996 | Nihal Chand | BJP |
233,112
(Lead:
55,634)
|
46% |
| Birbal Ram | INC | 177,478 | 35% | |
| 1991 | Birbal Ram | INC |
213,338
(Lead:
111,991)
|
46% |
| Dungar Ram Panwar | BJP | 101,347 | 22% | |
| 1989 | Bega Ram | JD |
307,279
(Lead:
63,533)
|
54% |
| Heera Lal Indora | INC | 243,746 | 43% | |
| 1984 | Birbal | INC |
282,573
(Lead:
165,514)
|
64% |
| Begaram | LKD | 117,059 | 26% | |
| 1980 | Birbal | INC(I) |
226,973
(Lead:
85,840)
|
52% |
| Bega Ram | JNP(S) | 141,133 | 32% | |
| 1977 | Bega Ram | BLD |
204,812
(Lead:
65,355)
|
56% |
| Birbal | INC | 139,457 | 38% | |
| 1971 | Panna Lal Barupal | INC |
157,863
(Lead:
65,908)
|
58% |
| Ganesh Ram | IND | 91,955 | 34% | |
| 1967 | P. Lal | INC |
117,966
(Lead:
56,378)
|
37% |
| G. Chand | SWA | 61,588 | 19% | |
| 1962 | Panna Lal | INC |
134,133
(Lead:
59,620)
|
40% |
| Ram Chandra | IND | 74,513 | 22% |
Kuldeep Indora from INC, is the MP of Ganganagar.
The polling percentage for Ganganagar in 2024 was 66.59 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.