For this constituency, the election was successfully held on June 1st. The voter turnout was 67.90 percent.Chandigarh Lok Sabha Constituency in Chandigarh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Chandigarh reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Chandigarh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Chandigarh Lok Sabha Constituency, Manish Tewari from Indian National Congress and Sanjay Tandon from Bharatiya Janta Party are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Chandigarh Lok Sabha elections.
Indian National Congress
Bharatiya Janta Party
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Manish Tewari
Winner
|
Indian National Congress |
2,16,657
Lead: 2,504
|
48.22% |
| Sanjay Tandon | Bharatiya Janata Party | 2,14,153 | 47.67% |
| Ritu Singh | Bahujan Samaj Party | 6,708 | 1.49% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 2,912 | 0.65% |
| Lakhvir Singh Alias Kotla | Independent | 2,626 | 0.58% |
| Deepanshu Sharma | Akhil Bhartiya Parivar Party | 1,068 | 0.24% |
| Ex-assistant Commandant Ranpreet Singh | Independent | 1,054 | 0.23% |
| Vinod Kumar | Independent | 683 | 0.15% |
| Sunil Thaman | Haryana Jansena Party | 577 | 0.13% |
| Baljeet Singh Alias Laddi | Independent | 436 | 0.1% |
| Sunil Kumar | Independent | 321 | 0.07% |
| Partap Singh Rana | Independent | 307 | 0.07% |
| Mahant Ravi Kant Muni | Independent | 295 | 0.07% |
| Vivek Sharma | Independent | 294 | 0.07% |
| Piar Chand Alias Koundal | Independent | 255 | 0.06% |
| Kishor Kumar Alias Banti Bhaiya | Independent | 239 | 0.05% |
| Rajinder Kaur | Sainik Samaj Party | 217 | 0.05% |
| Raj Prince Singh | Super Power India Party | 205 | 0.05% |
| Pushpinder Singh Alias Lovely Attawa | Independent | 154 | 0.03% |
| Kuldip Rai Alias Happy Sood Morinda | Independent | 114 | 0.03% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Manish Tewari | INC |
216,657
(Lead:
2,504)
|
48% |
| Sanjay Tandon | BJP | 214,153 | 48% | |
| 2019 | Kirron Kher | BJP |
231,188
(Lead:
46,970)
|
51% |
| Pawan Kumar Bansal | INC | 184,218 | 40% | |
| 2014 | Kher Kirron Anupam | BJP |
191,362
(Lead:
69,642)
|
42% |
| Pawan Kumar Bansal | INC | 121,720 | 27% | |
| 2009 | Pawan Kumar Bansal | INC |
161,042
(Lead:
58,967)
|
47% |
| Satya Pal Jain | BJP | 102,075 | 30% | |
| 2004 | Pawan Kumar Bansal | INC |
139,880
(Lead:
45,248)
|
52% |
| Satya Pal Jain | BJP | 94,632 | 35% | |
| 1999 | Pawan Kumar Bansal | INC |
132,924
(Lead:
5,449)
|
47% |
| Krishan Lal Sharma | BJP | 127,475 | 45% | |
| 1998 | Satya Pal Jain | BJP |
119,787
(Lead:
10,366)
|
42% |
| Pawan Kumar Bansal | INC | 109,421 | 39% | |
| 1996 | Satya Pal Jain | BJP |
101,137
(Lead:
23,969)
|
39% |
| Pawan Kumar Bansal | INC | 77,168 | 30% | |
| 1991 | Pawan Kumar Bansal | INC |
76,628
(Lead:
15,095)
|
36% |
| Satya Pal Jain | BJP | 61,533 | 29% | |
| 1989 | Harmohan Dhawan | JD |
91,212
(Lead:
3,974)
|
42% |
| Jagan Nath Kaushal | INC | 87,238 | 40% | |
| 1984 | Jagan Nath Kaushal | INC |
103,090
(Lead:
66,300)
|
66% |
| Harmohan Dhawan | JNP | 36,790 | 24% | |
| 1980 | Jagan Nath Kasuhal | INC(I) |
61,624
(Lead:
33,319)
|
50% |
| Ram Swrup | IND | 28,305 | 23% | |
| 1977 | Krishna Kant | BLD |
70,808
(Lead:
40,426)
|
66% |
| Sat Pal | INC | 30,382 | 28% | |
| 1971 | Amar Nath Vidyalankar | INC |
48,335
(Lead:
31,481)
|
67% |
| Shri Chand Goyal | BJS | 16,854 | 23% | |
| 1967 | C. Goyal | BJS |
23,939
(Lead:
12,616)
|
49% |
| A. Nath | INC | 11,323 | 23% |
Manish Tewari from INC, is the MP of Chandigarh.
The polling percentage for Chandigarh in 2024 was 67.90 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.