For this constituency, the election was successfully held on May 7th. The voter turnout was 54.93 percent.Bhind Lok Sabha Constituency in Madhya Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Bhind reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Madhya Pradesh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Bhind Lok Sabha Constituency, Smt. Sandhya Rai from Bharatiya Janta Party and Phool Singh Baraiya from Indian National Congress are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Bhind Lok Sabha elections.
Bharatiya Janta Party
Indian National Congress
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Smt. Sandhya Rai
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
5,37,065
Lead: 64,840
|
51.2% |
| Phool Singh Baraiya | Indian National Congress | 4,72,225 | 45.02% |
| Devashish Jarariya | Bahujan Samaj Party | 20,465 | 1.95% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 6,534 | 0.62% |
| Umesh Garg | Independent | 5,072 | 0.48% |
| Rekha Shakya | Independent | 2,667 | 0.25% |
| Harimohan | Independent | 2,610 | 0.25% |
| Rakesh | Independent | 2,369 | 0.23% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ater |
Hemant Satyadev Katare
INC
|
69,542 | 45.51% |
| Lahar |
Ambrish Sharma 'guddu'
BJP
|
75,347 | 42.87% |
| Datia |
Rajendra Bharti
INC
|
88,977 | 50.34% |
| Sewda |
Pradeep Agarwal
BJP
|
43,834 | 31.14% |
| Mehgaon |
Rakesh Shukla
BJP
|
87,153 | 48.01% |
| Bhander |
Phool Singh Baraiya
INC
|
82,043 | 58.67% |
| Gohad |
Keshav Desai
INC
|
69,941 | 47.32% |
| Bhind |
Narendra Singh Kushwaha
BJP
|
66,420 | 40.96% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Smt. Sandhya Rai | BJP |
537,065
(Lead:
64,840)
|
51% |
| Phool Singh Baraiya | INC | 472,225 | 45% | |
| 2019 | Sandhya Ray | BJP |
527,694
(Lead:
199,885)
|
55% |
| Devashish | INC | 327,809 | 34% | |
| 2014 | Dr. Bhagirath Prasad | BJP |
404,474
(Lead:
159,961)
|
56% |
| Imarti Devi | INC | 244,513 | 34% | |
| 2009 | Ashok Argal Chhaviram | BJP |
227,365
(Lead:
18,886)
|
43% |
| Dr. Bhagirath Prasad | INC | 208,479 | 40% | |
| 2004 | Dr. Ramlakhan Singh | BJP |
234,712
(Lead:
6,946)
|
39% |
| Satyadev Katare | INC | 227,766 | 38% | |
| 1999 | Dr. Ramlakhan Singh | BJP |
270,766
(Lead:
53,574)
|
41% |
| Satyadev Katare | INC | 217,192 | 33% | |
| 1998 | Dr. Ram Lakhan Singh | BJP |
292,682
(Lead:
98,908)
|
42% |
| Kedar Nath Kachhi | BSP | 193,774 | 28% | |
| 1996 | Dr. Ram Lakhan Singh | BJP |
198,109
(Lead:
15,798)
|
39% |
| Kedar Nath Kushwah (kachhi) | BSP | 182,311 | 36% | |
| 1991 | Yoganand Saraswati | BJP |
142,185
(Lead:
38,854)
|
36% |
| Udayan Sharma | INC | 103,331 | 26% | |
| 1989 | Narsingh Rao Dixit | BJP |
136,765
(Lead:
21,924)
|
30% |
| Ram Bihari | BSP | 114,841 | 25% | |
| 1984 | Krishna Singh | INC |
194,160
(Lead:
87,403)
|
48% |
| Vasundhara Raje | BJP | 106,757 | 26% | |
| 1980 | Kalicharan Sharma | INC(I) |
105,806
(Lead:
10,036)
|
33% |
| Rama Shankar Singh | JNP(S) | 95,770 | 30% | |
| 1977 | Raghubir Singh Machhand | BLD |
241,267
(Lead:
160,894)
|
73% |
| Raghav Ram | INC | 80,373 | 24% | |
| 1971 | Vijaya Raje Scindia | BJS |
213,771
(Lead:
91,238)
|
61% |
| Narsinghrao Dixit | INC | 122,533 | 35% | |
| 1967 | Y.s. Kushwah | BJS |
137,586
(Lead:
71,209)
|
46% |
| V. Singh | INC | 66,377 | 22% | |
| 1962 | Suraj Prasad Alias Surya Prashad | INC |
75,730
(Lead:
2,787)
|
33% |
| Atam Das | PSP | 72,943 | 32% |
Smt. Sandhya Rai from BJP, is the MP of Bhind.
The polling percentage for Bhind in 2024 was 54.93 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.