For this constituency, the election was successfully held on May 20th. The voter turnout was 62.53 percent.Mohanlalganj Lok Sabha Constituency in Uttar Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Mohanlalganj reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Uttar Pradesh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Mohanlalganj Lok Sabha Constituency, R K Chaudhary from Samajwadi Party , Rajesh Kumar from Bahujan Samaj Party and Kaushal Kishore from Bharatiya Janta Party are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Mohanlalganj Lok Sabha elections.
Samajwadi Party
Bahujan Samaj Party
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
R K Chaudhary
Winner
|
Samajwadi Party |
6,67,869
Lead: 70,292
|
48.49% |
| Kaushal Kishore | Bharatiya Janata Party | 5,97,577 | 43.38% |
| Rajesh Kumar | Bahujan Samaj Party | 88,461 | 6.42% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 8,866 | 0.64% |
| Mahendra | Independent | 2,661 | 0.19% |
| Sushil Kumar | Independent | 2,627 | 0.19% |
| Ramesh Kumar | Independent | 1,841 | 0.13% |
| Sunita Chheda Pasi | Aam Janta Party (india) | 1,749 | 0.13% |
| S. L.singh | Peoples Party Of India (democratic) | 1,717 | 0.12% |
| Brijesh Kumar Vikram | Rashtriya Samaj Paksha | 1,655 | 0.12% |
| Jitendra Kumar | Independent | 1,414 | 0.1% |
| Suraj Kumar | Sardar Patel Siddhant Party | 1,015 | 0.07% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mohanlalganj |
Amaresh Kumar
BJP
|
107,089 | 43.58% |
| Bakshi Kaa Talab |
Yogesh Shukla
BJP
|
147,922 | 46.36% |
| Sidhauli |
Maneesh Rawat
BJP
|
106,222 | 43.58% |
| Malihabad |
Smt. Jaya Devi
BJP
|
106,372 | 44.15% |
| Sarojini Nagar |
Rajrajeswar Singh
BJP
|
160,626 | 49.07% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R K Chaudhary | SP |
667,869
(Lead:
70,292)
|
48% |
| Kaushal Kishore | BJP | 597,577 | 43% | |
| 2019 | Kaushal Kishore | BJP |
629,748
(Lead:
90,229)
|
50% |
| C. L. Verma | BSP | 539,519 | 43% | |
| 2014 | Kaushal Kishore | BJP |
455,274
(Lead:
145,416)
|
41% |
| R.k Chaudhary | BSP | 309,858 | 28% | |
| 2009 | Sushila Saroj | SP |
256,367
(Lead:
76,595)
|
37% |
| Jai Prakash | BSP | 179,772 | 26% | |
| 2004 | Jai Prakash | SP |
148,578
(Lead:
2,568)
|
26% |
| Radhe Lal | BSP | 146,010 | 26% | |
| 1999 | Reena Chowdhary | SP |
182,034
(Lead:
35,358)
|
30% |
| Purnima Verma | BJP | 146,676 | 24% | |
| 1998 | Reena Chaudhary | SP |
200,108
(Lead:
11,164)
|
34% |
| Smt. Purnima Verma | BJP | 188,944 | 32% | |
| 1996 | Purnima Verma | BJP |
164,586
(Lead:
32,439)
|
35% |
| Suntvaksh Rawat | SP | 132,147 | 28% | |
| 1991 | Chhotey Lal | BJP |
104,516
(Lead:
10,212)
|
28% |
| Dinesh Kumar Alias D.k. Anand | JP | 94,304 | 25% | |
| 1989 | Sarju Prasad Saroj | JD |
162,689
(Lead:
18,176)
|
42% |
| Jagannath Prasad | INC | 144,513 | 37% | |
| 1984 | Jagannath Pd. | INC |
189,704
(Lead:
133,049)
|
56% |
| Ram Lal Kureel | LKD | 56,655 | 17% | |
| 1980 | Kailash Pati | INC(I) |
111,819
(Lead:
43,065)
|
44% |
| Ram Lal Kuril | JNP(S) | 68,754 | 27% | |
| 1977 | Ram Lal Kuril | BLD |
203,445
(Lead:
155,742)
|
76% |
| Ganga Devi | INC | 47,703 | 18% | |
| 1971 | Ganga Devi | INC |
105,565
(Lead:
59,280)
|
63% |
| Khayali Ram | NCO | 46,285 | 28% | |
| 1967 | G. Devi | INC |
90,283
(Lead:
35,804)
|
41% |
| R. Baksh | BJS | 54,479 | 25% | |
| 1962 | Ganga Devi | INC |
78,752
(Lead:
44,210)
|
43% |
| Ram Baksh | JS | 34,542 | 19% |
R K Chaudhary from SP, is the MP of Mohanlalganj.
The polling percentage for Mohanlalganj in 2024 was 62.53 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.