For this constituency, the election was successfully held on April 19th. The voter turnout was 43.79 percent.Nawada Lok Sabha Constituency in Bihar is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Nawada reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Bihar. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Nawada Lok Sabha Constituency, Vivek Thakur from Bharatiya Janta Party and Shravan Kushwaha from Rashtriya Janata Dal are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Nawada Lok Sabha elections.
Bharatiya Janta Party
Rashtriya Janata Dal
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vivek Thakur
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
4,10,608
Lead: 67,670
|
47.2% |
| Shravan Kushwaha | Rashtriya Janata Dal | 3,42,938 | 39.42% |
| Binod Yadav | Independent | 39,519 | 4.54% |
| Gunjan Kumar | Independent | 29,682 | 3.41% |
| Ranjit Kumar | Bahujan Samaj Party | 16,316 | 1.88% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 12,592 | 1.45% |
| Anand Kumar Verma | Bharat Jan Jagran Dal | 7,736 | 0.89% |
| Gautam Kumar Babloo | Bhagidari Party(p) | 5,889 | 0.68% |
| Ganauri Pandit | Peoples Party Of India (democratic) | 4,590 | 0.53% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hisua |
Anil Singh
BJP
|
95,885 | 44.40% |
| Barbigha |
Dr. Kumar Pushpanjay
JDU
|
61,882 | 42.85% |
| Rajauli (SC) |
Vimal Rajvanshi
LJP (RV)
|
90,272 | 44.98% |
| Nawada |
Vibha Devi
JDU
|
87,423 | 43.39% |
| Gobindpur |
Raju Tiwari
LJP (RV)
|
72,581 | 40.12% |
| Warsaliganj |
Anita Devi Mahto
RJD
|
97,833 | 48.72% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Vivek Thakur | BJP |
410,608
(Lead:
67,670)
|
47% |
| Shravan Kushwaha | RJD | 342,938 | 39% | |
| 2019 | Chandan Singh | LJNSP |
495,684
(Lead:
148,072)
|
53% |
| Vibha Devi | RJD | 347,612 | 37% | |
| 2014 | Giriraj Singh | BJP |
390,248
(Lead:
140,157)
|
45% |
| Raj Ballabh Prasad | RJD | 250,091 | 29% | |
| 2009 | Bhola Singh | BJP |
130,608
(Lead:
34,917)
|
22% |
| Veena Devi | LJP | 95,691 | 16% | |
| 2004 | Virchandra Paswan | RJD |
489,992
(Lead:
56,006)
|
49% |
| Sanjay Paswan | BJP | 433,986 | 43% | |
| 1999 | Sanjay Paswan | BJP |
453,943
(Lead:
84,085)
|
53% |
| Vijay Kumar Choudhary | RJD | 369,858 | 43% | |
| 1998 | Malti Devi | RJD |
405,495
(Lead:
14,384)
|
47% |
| Kameshwar Paswan | BJP | 391,111 | 45% | |
| 1996 | Kameshwar Paswan | BJP |
310,194
(Lead:
96,914)
|
42% |
| Premchand Ram | CPM | 213,280 | 29% | |
| 1991 | Prem Chand Ram | CPM |
418,010
(Lead:
101,593)
|
52% |
| Mahaveer Choudhary | INC | 316,417 | 39% | |
| 1989 | Prem Pardeep | CPM |
310,370
(Lead:
149,602)
|
48% |
| Kamaswar Paswan | BJP | 160,768 | 25% | |
| 1984 | Kunwar Ram | INC |
351,358
(Lead:
237,102)
|
64% |
| Prem Pradeep | CPM | 114,256 | 21% | |
| 1980 | Kunwar Ram | INC(I) |
183,736
(Lead:
56,187)
|
42% |
| Prem Pradeep | CPM | 127,549 | 29% | |
| 1977 | Nathuni Ram | BLD |
429,785
(Lead:
362,701)
|
84% |
| Mahabir Chaudhary | INC | 67,084 | 13% | |
| 1971 | Sukhdeo Prasad Verma | INC |
152,569
(Lead:
53,281)
|
39% |
| Mahanth Surya Prakash Narayan Puri | IND | 99,288 | 25% | |
| 1967 | M. S. P. N. Puri | IND |
110,766
(Lead:
20,220)
|
38% |
| G. P. Sinha | INC | 90,546 | 31% | |
| 1962 | Ramdhani Das | INC |
99,106
(Lead:
71,394)
|
51% |
| Akloo Manjhi | JS | 27,712 | 14% |
Vivek Thakur from BJP, is the MP of Nawada.
The polling percentage for Nawada in 2024 was 43.79 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.