For this constituency, the election was successfully held on May 25th. The voter turnout was 56.61 percent.Basti Lok Sabha Constituency in Uttar Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Basti reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Uttar Pradesh. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. As for the 2024 candidates list in Basti Lok Sabha Constituency, Ram Prasad Chaudhary from Samajwadi Party , Dayashankar Mishra from Bahujan Samaj Party and Harish Dwivedi from Bharatiya Janta Party are the prominent candidates. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Basti Lok Sabha elections.
Samajwadi Party
Bahujan Samaj Party
| Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ram Prasad Chaudhary
Winner
|
Samajwadi Party |
5,27,005
Lead: 1,00,994
|
48.67% |
| Harish Dwivedi | Bharatiya Janata Party | 4,26,011 | 39.34% |
| Dayashankar Mishra | Bahujan Samaj Party | 1,03,301 | 9.54% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 7,761 | 0.72% |
| Pankaj Dubey | Log Party | 4,627 | 0.43% |
| Prem Kumar | Moulik Adhikar Party | 3,611 | 0.33% |
| Hafiz Ali | All India Forward Bloc | 2,988 | 0.28% |
| Ram Karan Gautam | Independent | 2,645 | 0.24% |
| Pramod Kumar | Independent | 2,557 | 0.24% |
| Shailendra Kumar | Bharat Mahaparivar Party | 2,364 | 0.22% |
| Assembly Constituencies | Winner | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harraiya |
Ajay Kumar Singh
BJP
|
88,200 | 39.85% |
| Kaptanganj |
Atul Chaudhary
SP
|
94,273 | 43.66% |
| Basti Sadar |
Mahendra Yadav
SP
|
86,029 | 39.81% |
| Mahadewa |
Dudhram
SBSP
|
83,350 | 39.47% |
| Rudhauli |
Rajendra Chaudhary
SP
|
86,360 | 36.82% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Ram Prasad Chaudhary | SP |
527,005
(Lead:
100,994)
|
49% |
| Harish Dwivedi | BJP | 426,011 | 39% | |
| 2019 | Harish Chandra Alias Harish Dwivedi | BJP |
471,162
(Lead:
30,354)
|
45% |
| Ram Prasad Chaudhary | BSP | 440,808 | 42% | |
| 2014 | Harish Chandra Alias Harish Dwivedi | BJP |
357,680
(Lead:
33,562)
|
34% |
| Brij Kishor Singh Dimpal | SP | 324,118 | 31% | |
| 2009 | Arvind Kumar Chaudhary | BSP |
268,666
(Lead:
105,210)
|
35% |
| Raj Kishor Singh | SP | 163,456 | 21% | |
| 2004 | Lal Mani Prasad | BSP |
155,223
(Lead:
25,374)
|
27% |
| Sriram Chauhan | BJP | 129,849 | 23% | |
| 1999 | Shriram Chauhan | BJP |
174,378
(Lead:
1,832)
|
30% |
| Lal Mani Prasad | BSP | 172,546 | 29% | |
| 1998 | Shri Ram Chauhan | BJP |
244,233
(Lead:
70,217)
|
40% |
| Kalp Nath Sonkar | SP | 174,016 | 28% | |
| 1996 | Sriram Chauhan | BJP |
199,941
(Lead:
49,838)
|
38% |
| Ramkaran Arya | SP | 150,103 | 28% | |
| 1991 | Shyam Lal Kamal | BJP |
160,375
(Lead:
71,465)
|
37% |
| Ram Dularey Sonker | JD | 88,910 | 21% | |
| 1989 | Kalpa Nath Sonakar | JD |
179,586
(Lead:
33,219)
|
40% |
| Ram Awadh Prasad | INC | 146,367 | 33% | |
| 1984 | Ram Awadh Prasad | INC |
227,397
(Lead:
154,602)
|
67% |
| Ram Dulera Sonkar | LKD | 72,795 | 22% | |
| 1980 | Kalpnath | INC(I) |
107,432
(Lead:
26,890)
|
41% |
| Girdhari Lal | JNP(S) | 80,542 | 31% | |
| 1977 | Sheo Narain | BLD |
216,542
(Lead:
140,377)
|
70% |
| Anant Prasad Dhusia | INC | 76,165 | 24% | |
| 1971 | Anant Prasad Dhusia | INC |
105,848
(Lead:
72,109)
|
58% |
| Sheo Narain | NCO | 33,739 | 19% | |
| 1967 | S. Narain | INC |
88,637
(Lead:
18,790)
|
39% |
| R. Piarey | BJS | 69,847 | 31% | |
| 1962 | Keshava Deva Malaviya | INC |
90,735
(Lead:
18,921)
|
45% |
| K. K. K. Nayar | JS | 71,814 | 35% |
Ram Prasad Chaudhary from SP, is the MP of Basti.
The polling percentage for Basti in 2024 was 56.61 %.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.