The Nagada-khachrod constituency witnessed an interesting fight in the 2023 assembly election. The voters exercised their voting franchise and 80.83% of voting was recorded in this constituency..
Dr. Tejbahadur Singh of the Bharatiya Janata Party won the seat by defeating Dilip Singh Gurjar of the Indian National Congress with a margin of 15927 votes.The Nagada-khachrod Assembly constituency falls under the Ujjain Lok Sabha constituency. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, Bharatiya Janata Party candidate Anil Firoziya won the Ujjain Lok Sabha (MP) seat with a margin of 375860 votes, defeating Mahesh Parmar of the Indian National Congress. For all breaking news, trends, and analysis, stay tuned.
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dr. Tejbahadur Singh
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
93,552
Lead: 15,927
|
52.18% |
| Dilip Singh Gurjar | Indian National Congress | 77,625 | 43.30% |
| Narendra Chouhan | Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram) | 1,977 | 1.10% |
| Lokendra Mehta | Independent | 1,597 | 0.89% |
| Subodh Krishna Swamy | Aam Aadmi Party | 1,495 | 0.83% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 1,126 | 0.63% |
| Ad. Karan Singh Gurjar | Bahujan Samaj Party | 943 | 0.53% |
| Jagdish Chandra Prajapati | Independent | 449 | 0.25% |
| Narendra Parmar | Akhand Bharat Samrajya Party | 317 | 0.18% |
| Anand Kumar Gotharwal | Independent | 210 | 0.12% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dilip Gurjar
Winner
|
Indian National Congress |
83,823
Lead: 5,117
|
50% |
| Dilipsingh Shekhawat | Bharatiya Janata Party | 78,706 | 47% |
| None Of The Above | 1,318 | 1% | |
| Kailash Chandra Rathore | Bahujan Samaj Party | 895 | 1% |
| Jitendra Chaturvedi | Shiv Sena | 892 | 1% |
| Riyaj Mohammed | Independent | 821 | 0% |
| Rashid Mohhmad Shekh | Independent | 632 | 0% |
| Ratansingh | Aam Aadmi Party | 289 | 0% |
| Mahesh | Independent | 201 | 0% |
| Jagdish Chawda | Independent | 165 | 0% |
| Ramchandra Parmar | Bahujan Mukti Party | 160 | 0% |
| Kailashchandra Ahirwar | Independent | 108 | 0% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dilip Singh Shekhawat
Winner
|
Bharatiya Janta Party |
78,036
Lead: 16,115
|
53% |
| Dilip Gurjar | Indian National Congress | 61,921 | 42% |
| Kunwar Nayab Uddin Jhirnya | Samajwadi Party | 1,975 | 1% |
| Kaluram Rathore | Bahujan Samaj Party | 982 | 1% |
| Vikram Vyas | Independent | 979 | 1% |
| Hukum Singh Panwar | Independent | 811 | 1% |
| Ramchandr Parmar | All India Forward Bloc | 699 | 0% |
| Firoz Azam | Independent | 459 | 0% |
| Radheshyam Singh Makla | Independent | 351 | 0% |
| Kelash Ahirwar | Independent | 257 | 0% |
| Anil Thakur | Independent | 235 | 0% |
| Govardhanlal | Independent | 169 | 0% |
| Jagdish Chandra Prajapati | Independent | 167 | 0% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dilip Singh Gurjar
Winner
|
Indian National Congress |
57,229
Lead: 9,892
|
50% |
| Dilip Singh Shekhawat | Bharatiya Janta Party | 47,337 | 42% |
| Jagdish Dhakad | Bahujan Samaj Party | 4,187 | 4% |
| Shyam Singh Raghuwanshi | Independent | 1,448 | 1% |
| Ranchhod-rupa Chandrawanshi | Samajwadi Party | 1,050 | 1% |
| Antar Singh Tomar | Independent | 849 | 1% |
| Bhawar Singh Pawar Ratnyakhedi | Bharatiya Jan Shakti | 507 | 0% |
| Anil Singh Raghuvanshi | Independent | 496 | 0% |
| Ramchandra Parmar | All India Forward Bloc | 368 | 0% |
| Prem Singh Solanki | Lok Jan Shakti Party | 287 | 0% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Lead | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dr. Tejbahadur Singh | BJP | 93,552 | 15,927 | 52.18% |
| 2018 | Dilip Gurjar | INC | 83,823 | 5,117 | 50% |
| 2013 | Dilip Singh Shekhawat | BJP | 78,036 | 16,115 | 53% |
| 2008 | Dilip Singh Gurjar | INC | 57,229 | 9,892 | 50% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dr. Tejbahadur Singh | BJP |
93,552
(Lead: 15,927)
|
52.18% |
| Dilip Singh Gurjar | INC | 77,625 | 43.30% | |
| 2018 | Dilip Gurjar | INC |
83,823
(Lead: 5,117)
|
50% |
| Dilipsingh Shekhawat | BJP | 78,706 | 47% | |
| 2013 | Dilip Singh Shekhawat | BJP |
78,036
(Lead: 16,115)
|
53% |
| Dilip Gurjar | INC | 61,921 | 42% | |
| 2008 | Dilip Singh Gurjar | INC |
57,229
(Lead: 9,892)
|
50% |
| Dilip Singh Shekhawat | BJP | 47,337 | 42% |
All 230 Assembly Constituencies in Madhya Pradesh
Dr. Tejbahadur Singh of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won the Nagada-khachrod Assembly seat in the 2023 elections, defeating Dilip Singh Gurjar of the Indian National Congress (INC) by a margin of 15927 votes.
The strike rate in the Nagada-khachrod constituency is 50% BJP and 50% INC, with BJP won 2 times and INC won 2 times since the 1980 elections.
Dr. Tejbahadur Singh (BJP) received 52.18% vote share.
Dilip Singh Gurjar (INC) received 43.30% vote share.
Dr. Tejbahadur Singh (BJP) won the 2023 election with 93552 votes, leading by 15927 votes and securing a 52.18% vote share.
The Nagada-khachrod Assembly constituency falls under the Ujjain (sc) Lok Sabha constituency of Ujjain district.
Dr. Tejbahadur Singh (BJP) won the Nagada-khachrod Assembly seat in 2023 with a margin of 15927 votes over Dilip Singh Gurjar (INC).
The Nagada-khachrod Assembly constituency is part of the Ujjain (sc) Lok Sabha constituency, which includes other areas like Mahidpur, Tarana (sc), Ghatiya (sc), Ujjain Uttar, Ujjain Dakshin, Badnagar, Alot (sc).
The top candidates in the Nagada-khachrod Assembly Election 2023 were:
Dr. Tejbahadur Singh (BJP)
Dilip Singh Gurjar (INC)
Narendra Chouhan (Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram))
These candidates were the main contenders for the seat, with Dr. Tejbahadur Singh (BJP) emerging as the winner.
The voter turnout in the Nagada-khachrod Assembly Election 2023 was 80.83%
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.