The Pencharthal constituency witnessed an interesting fight in the 2023 assembly election. The voters exercised their voting franchise .
Santana Chakma of the Bharatiya Janata Party won the seat by defeating Sadhan Kumar Chakma of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) with a margin of 7973 votes. For all breaking news, trends, and analysis, stay tuned.
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Santana Chakma
WINNER
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
17,781
Lead: 7,973
|
45.50% |
| Sadhan Kumar Chakma | Communist Party of India (Marxist) | 9,808 | 25.10% |
| Hollywood Chakma | Tipra Motha Party | 9,644 | 24.68% |
| Purnita Chakma | All India Trinamool Congress | 767 | 1.96% |
| Karnadhan Chakma | Independent | 551 | 1.41% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 527 | 1.35% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Santana Chakma
WINNER
|
Bharatiya Janata Party |
17,743
Lead: 1,373
|
49.58% |
| Anil Chakma | Communist Party Of India (marxist) | 16,370 | 45.75% |
| Nandini Chakma | Indian National Congress | 644 | 1.80% |
| None Of The Above | NOTA | 407 | 1.14% |
| Karnadhan Chakma | Amara Bengali | 223 | 0.62% |
| Kripamohan Reang | TLSP | 209 | 0.58% |
| Daniel Sangma | INPT | 187 | 0.52% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Arun Kumar Chakma
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
16,601
Lead: 1,017
|
% |
| Purnita Chakma | Indian National Congress | 15,584 | % |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Subodh Das
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
13,942
Lead: 1,708
|
% |
| Radhika Ranjan Das | Indian National Congress | 12,234 | % |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Subodh Das
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
10,931
Lead: 1,793
|
% |
| Bikash Sharma | Indian National Congress | 9,138 | % |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Subodh Das
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
8,852
Lead: 1,864
|
% |
| Kalidas Dutta | Indian National Congress | 6,988 | % |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Subodh Das
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
8,528
Lead: 1,885
|
% |
| Ashutosh Das | Indian National Congress | 6,643 | % |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Subodh Das
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
7,774
Lead: 1,283
|
% |
| Ashutosh Das | Indian National Congress | 6,491 | % |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Subhodh Chnadra Das
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
6,642
Lead: 3,595
|
% |
| Bibekananda Chakraborty | Independent | 3,047 | % |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Subodh Chandra Das
WINNER
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
5,588
Lead: 4,807
|
% |
| Debendra Chandra Nath | Independent | 781 | % |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Votes | Lead | Vote Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Santana Chakma | BJP | 17,781 | 7,973 | 45.50% |
| 2018 | Santana Chakma | BJP | 17,743 | 1,373 | 49.58% |
| 2013 | Arun Kumar Chakma | CPM | 16,601 | 1,017 | % |
| 2008 | Subodh Das | CPM | 13,942 | 1,708 | % |
| 2003 | Subodh Das | CPM | 10,931 | 1,793 | % |
| 1998 | Subodh Das | CPM | 8,852 | 1,864 | % |
| 1993 | Subodh Das | CPM | 8,528 | 1,885 | % |
| 1988 | Subodh Das | CPM | 7,774 | 1,283 | % |
| 1983 | Subhodh Chnadra Das | CPM | 6,642 | 3,595 | % |
| 1977 | Subodh Chandra Das | CPM | 5,588 | 4,807 | % |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Santana Chakma | BJP |
17,781
(Lead: 7,973)
|
45.50% |
| Sadhan Kumar Chakma | CPM | 9,808 | 25.10% | |
| 2018 | Santana Chakma | BJP |
17,743
(Lead: 1,373)
|
49.58% |
| Anil Chakma | CPM | 16,370 | 45.75% | |
| 2013 | Arun Kumar Chakma | CPM |
16,601
(Lead: 1,017)
|
% |
| Purnita Chakma | INC | 15,584 | % | |
| 2008 | Subodh Das | CPM |
13,942
(Lead: 1,708)
|
% |
| Radhika Ranjan Das | INC | 12,234 | % | |
| 2003 | Subodh Das | CPM |
10,931
(Lead: 1,793)
|
% |
| Bikash Sharma | INC | 9,138 | % | |
| 1998 | Subodh Das | CPM |
8,852
(Lead: 1,864)
|
% |
| Kalidas Dutta | INC | 6,988 | % | |
| 1993 | Subodh Das | CPM |
8,528
(Lead: 1,885)
|
% |
| Ashutosh Das | INC | 6,643 | % | |
| 1988 | Subodh Das | CPM |
7,774
(Lead: 1,283)
|
% |
| Ashutosh Das | INC | 6,491 | % | |
| 1983 | Subhodh Chnadra Das | CPM |
6,642
(Lead: 3,595)
|
% |
| Bibekananda Chakraborty | IND | 3,047 | % | |
| 1977 | Subodh Chandra Das | CPM |
5,588
(Lead: 4,807)
|
% |
| Debendra Chandra Nath | IND | 781 | % |
All 60 Assembly Constituencies in Tripura
Santana Chakma of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won the Pencharthal Assembly seat in the 2023 elections, defeating Sadhan Kumar Chakma of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM) by a margin of 7973 votes.
The strike rate in the Pencharthal constituency is 75% CPM and 25% BJP, with CPM won 8 times and BJP won 2 times since the 1977 elections.
Santana Chakma (BJP) received 45.50% vote share.
Sadhan Kumar Chakma (CPM) received 25.10% vote share.
Santana Chakma (BJP) won the 2023 election with 17781 votes, leading by 7973 votes and securing a 45.50% vote share.
The Pencharthal Assembly constituency falls under the Lok Sabha constituency of district.
Santana Chakma (BJP) won the Pencharthal Assembly seat in 2023 with a margin of 7973 votes over Sadhan Kumar Chakma (CPM).
The top candidates in the Pencharthal Assembly Election 2023 were:
Santana Chakma (BJP)
Sadhan Kumar Chakma (CPM)
Hollywood Chakma (TMP)
These candidates were the main contenders for the seat, with Santana Chakma (BJP) emerging as the winner.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.