Here is the complete and updated CPM candidate list for the Tripura Assembly Election 2023. This detailed list helps voters and political observers track who is contesting from each seat, along with key rivals and constituencies that could shape the party’s performance in the upcoming polls. Stay informed with the latest CPM candidates for Tripura 2023 and explore constituency-wise details to understand the party’s strategy and potential impact.
| Candidate name | Assembly Constituencies | Votes | Vote Share | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumodh Debbarma | Simna | 5,811 | 16.57% | LOST |
| Nayan Sarkar | Bamutia | 20,119 | 46.39% | WON |
| Sudip Sarkar | Barjala | 21,486 | 50.93% | WON |
| Pabitra Kar | Khayerpur | 18,343 | 38.79% | LOST |
| Sanjoy Das | Majlishpur | 16,177 | 35.46% | LOST |
| Radhacharan Debbarma | Mandaibazar | 7,077 | 16.35% | LOST |
| Shyamal Debbarma | Takarjala | 1,796 | 4.49% | LOST |
| Ramu Das | Pratapgarh | 26,422 | 49.61% | WON |
| Hiranmoy Narayan Debnath | Kamalasagar | 17,308 | 43.06% | LOST |
| Partha Pratim Majumder | Bishalgarh | 20,988 | 45.64% | LOST |
| Brinda Debbarma | Golaghati | 7,606 | 19.51% | LOST |
| Samsul Haque | Boxanagar | 19,404 | 50.34% | WON |
| Tapan Das | Nalchar | 18,452 | 44.24% | LOST |
| Shyamal Chakraborty | Sonamura | 20,039 | 50.47% | WON |
| Koushik Chanda | Dhanpur | 15,648 | 34.53% | LOST |
| Ranjit Debbarma | Ramchandraghat | 6,941 | 18.26% | LOST |
| Nirmal Biswas | Khowai | 19,696 | 49.73% | WON |
| Dilip Debbarma | Asharambari | 4,420 | 12.34% | LOST |
| Manindra Das | Kalyanpur-Pramodenagar | 10,981 | 26.73% | LOST |
| Swasthi Debbarma | Krishnapur | 8,679 | 25.14% | LOST |
| Naresh Jamatia | Bagma | 12,613 | 25.08% | LOST |
| Ratan Kumar Bhowmik | Kakraban-Salgarah | 18,574 | 37.87% | LOST |
| Sudhan Das | Rajnagar | 19,514 | 45% | LOST |
| Dipankar Sen | Belonia | 20,016 | 48.27% | WON |
| Ashok Mitra | Hrishyamukh | 19,986 | 46.37% | WON |
| Debendra Tripura | Jolaibari | 17,246 | 37.72% | LOST |
| Pravat Chowdhury | Manu | 14,922 | 33.28% | LOST |
| Jitendra Chaudhury | Sabroom | 21,801 | 49.02% | WON |
| Parikshit Kalai | Ampinagar | 4,151 | 11% | LOST |
| Parimal Debnath | Amarpur | 13,395 | 32.92% | LOST |
| Priyamani Debbarma | Karbook | 6,934 | 18.7% | LOST |
| Pabin Tripura | Raima Valley | 11,339 | 23.93% | LOST |
| Anjan Das | Surma | 12,475 | 29.04% | LOST |
| Amalendu Debbarma | Ambassa | 13,373 | 29.04% | LOST |
| Jiban Mohan Tripura | Chawmanu | 7,402 | 18.61% | LOST |
| Subrata Das | Fatikroy | 14,458 | 36.91% | LOST |
| Krishnendu Chowdhury | Chandipur | 16,818 | 41.26% | LOST |
| Islam Uddin | Kadamtala-Kurti | 20,012 | 49.65% | WON |
| Bijita Nath | Bagbassa | 17,444 | 43.74% | LOST |
| Shailendra Chandra Debnath | Jubarajnagar | 19,386 | 49.29% | WON |
| Shital Das | Panisagar | 13,247 | 35.01% | LOST |
| Sadhan Kumar Chakma | Pencharthal | 9,808 | 25.1% | LOST |
| Rajendra Reang | Kanchanpur | 10,522 | 24.88% | LOST |
The CPM candidate list for Tripura Assembly Election 2023 includes all nominees contesting across 60 assembly constituencies.
CPM is contesting a significant number of the 60 assembly seats in Tripura, focusing on both traditional strongholds and strategic constituencies to maximize its electoral impact.
Key high-profile CPM candidates contesting in notable constituencies will be highlighted here.
Yes, CPM has introduced several fresh candidates alongside seasoned leaders to appeal to youth voters and consolidate its voter base across key regions.
The complete constituency-wise CPM candidate list is available on this page, detailing the nominees for all seats, their opponents, and key contest highlights.
The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.