No additional restrictions against free speech of public functionaries can be imposed: SC
New Delhi, Jan 03: The Supreme Court has held that there shall be no additional restrictions on freedom of speech and said that ministers, MPs and MLAs enjoy freedom of speech in equal measure as other citizens under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
A Constitution Bench comprising, Justices Abdul Naseer, A S Bopanna, B R Gavai, V Ramasubramanian and B V Nagarathna held that like all other citizens, no additional restrictions, other than which are prescribed under Article 19(2) of the Constitution can be imposed on a public representative under right to freedom of speech and expression.

The Bench delivered the verdict after hearing a batch of petitions relating to the scope of freedom of speech for public functionaries. It also took into note whether greater restrictions can be imposed on their right in the greater interest of citizens and their right to life and personal liberty.
The petitions arose after the Samajwadi Party leader, Azam Khan had made a remark on a 2016 gang-rape of a minor and her mother in Uttar Pradesh.
"Additional restrictions not found under Article 19(2) cannot be imposed on the exercise of article 19(1)(a). Grounds mentioned in Article 19(2) for restricting free speech are exhaustive. Additional restrictions not found in Article 19(2) cannot be imposed on the exercise of right under 19(1)(a)," the Bench held.
The Supreme Court also ruled that a statement made by a minister related to the government or its affairs can be attributed to the government.
Recommended Video
A mere statement by a minister inconsistent with the rights of the citizens does not form to be a Constitutional tort. However, if it leads to omission or commission of offence by a public official then it is a Constitutional tort, the Bench said.
Bar and Bench reported that Justice Nagarathna in a separate verdict said while the freedom of speech and expression is a much needed right, so that citizens are well informed about their rights, it cannot turn into hate speech.
"Hate speech in the sense strikes at the foundational values by making the society unequal ands also attacks citizens from diverse backgrounds especially in a country like us that is Bharat. it shall be the duty of every indian to uphold the dignity of every individual irrespective of religion, caste etc and also uphold the dignity of women," Justice Nagarathna said.
-
Kerala 2026 Elections: Opinion Poll Shows LDF-UDF Neck-and-Neck Race; NDA Emerges as Decisive Factor -
Why Is Noida Airport So Far From Noida? Abhijit Ganguly Questions Logic Behind Noida Airport Location -
Khushbu's Husband Sundar C To Contest Tamil Nadu Polls From Madurai -
Iran Crisis: Can Trump Really Rename The Strait Of Hormuz? -
Noida International Airport to Become India’s Most Uniquely Connected Airport, Linked to 5 Major Expressways -
Tamil Nadu Dry Days: TASMAC Shops To Be Closed On These Dates As EC Imposes Ban On Alcohol Sale -
DMK Announces Candidate List: CM MK Stalin To Contest From Kolathur, Udhayanidhi From Chepauk-Triplicane -
Elon Musk Joined Private Call Between Trump-Modi On Iran War: Report -
‘Picture Hai Vo? Teen Ghante Bakwaas’: Asaduddin Owaisi Tears Into Dhurandhar 2 Despite Record Box Office Run -
Aries Horoscope for Today March 28, 2026, Saturday - Fast Changes Demand Patience And Clear Choices -
From Tamil Nadu to Puducherry, DMK–Congress Ties Show Signs of Stress -
After Changing Officers, Why No Action? Mamata Banerjee Slams Murshidabad Clashes, Says “Don’t Blame Me”












Click it and Unblock the Notifications