Here's What Delhi High Court Said On Demand To Constitute Sanatan Dharma Raksha Board

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) that sought the establishment of a "Sanatan Dharm Raksha Board." The division bench, led by Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, stated that forming such a board is a policy matter. Therefore, the court cannot direct its creation. The petitioner, Sanatan Hindu Sewa Sangh Trust, was advised to take their concerns to the government.

The plea highlighted that while boards exist for Muslims and Sikhs, like the Waqf Board and Sikh Parbandhak Committee, there is no equivalent for Hindus. It expressed concern over perceived threats to Sanatan Dharm from religious conversions. The plea argued that these conversions contradict the customs and desires of Sanatan Dharm followers.

Concerns Over Temple Management

The petition also pointed out that many temples in India are managed by the government. Despite collecting funds from these temples, the government has not established a national body for protecting Sanatan/Hindu religion. The plea suggested that such a body should be under governmental control and management.

The court remarked on its limitations in addressing the PIL's requests. It acknowledged lacking the necessary expertise or jurisdiction to grant what was sought in the petition. This decision underscores the judiciary's role in respecting policy domains reserved for legislative or executive branches.

While dismissing the PIL, the court reiterated its stance on non-interference in matters best suited for governmental decision-making. The bench's advice to approach relevant authorities reflects an understanding of separation between judicial functions and policy formulation.

This case highlights ongoing debates about religious representation and governance in India. It raises questions about how different communities perceive their treatment under existing legal frameworks and government policies.

As discussions continue, stakeholders may explore alternative avenues to address their concerns within India's democratic framework. Engaging with policymakers directly could pave the way for more inclusive solutions that respect diverse religious sentiments while adhering to constitutional principles.