CJI D Y Chandrachud Highlights Importance of Institutional Improvement Without Implying Flaws

Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud addressed concerns about the collegium system, emphasising that while improvements are always possible, it doesn't imply fundamental flaws. Speaking at an event organised by Marathi daily 'Loksatta', he highlighted the system's federal nature, involving both central and state governments alongside the judiciary. He described it as a consultative process where consensus is sought, though not always achieved.

Chandrachud stressed the importance of maturity in recognising the system's strengths, even when consensus isn't reached. "We must have the maturity to understand that this represents the strength of our system," he stated. He expressed hope for greater consensus but acknowledged that different levels within the judiciary and government handle disagreements maturely.

Judiciary's Role in Democratic Governance

The Chief Justice pointed out that criticism of institutions is easy, yet it's crucial to acknowledge their capacity for improvement. He remarked, "Every institution is capable of betterment." However, he cautioned against assuming fundamental issues exist just because enhancements are possible. He noted that these institutions have endured for over 75 years, underscoring their role in democratic governance.

Addressing another query, Chandrachud explained that judges face increasing workloads as they ascend in the judiciary. Their responsibilities grow in both volume and complexity. He clarified that judges remain dedicated to their duties even during vacations, contrary to misconceptions about them being idle or negligent.

Challenges Faced by Judges

The Chief Justice raised concerns about whether judges have enough time to reflect on legal matters beyond their caseloads. He questioned if society expects judges to be mere case-disposal machines without time for contemplation. "Do we give our judges sufficient time to think or read about the law?" he asked.

Chandrachud also discussed social media's impact on judging, acknowledging its challenges but recognising its societal benefits. He noted that judges must be cautious with their words and language due to social media's influence. Despite its drawbacks, he believes social media allows users to connect with a broad audience.

The Chief Justice concluded by reiterating his belief in social media's positive role in society. "I still feel that the advent of social media is good for society," he remarked, highlighting its potential to reach vast sections of the population.