SEBI asks Sahara head Subrata Roy to provide asset details

Details have been sought to proceed with the regulator's attachment orders involving sale of assets of two Sahara firms and their top executives to recover funds for the purpose of facilitating refund to bond holders.
In an order passed today, Sebi said it would go ahead with finalising the terms of the proclamation of sale ex parte, if Subrata Roy, Ashok Roy Choudhary, Ravi Shankar Dubey and Vandana Bhargava fail to appear before the regulator.
Sebi has also sought details about assets, bank accounts and other financial information of the two Sahara firms -- Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corp Ltd (SHICL).
The matter relates to a Supreme Court order for refund of an estimated Rs 24,000 crore to bond holders of the two firms, wherein Sebi has been asked to facilitate the refund.
Sebi said it issued an attachment order against the companies and their top executives after they failed to make the refund as per the court order.
In the attachment order dated February 13, Sebi had also asked them to provide details of their assets etc within 21 days.
In today's order, Sebi said that the companies and the individuals have failed to furnish these details as directed earlier and therefore it was going ahead with the settlement of the terms for sale of their assets.
Sebi said it is necessary to examine Subrata Roy and three others to ascertain details of their personal assets as also investments and assets of the two companies "to comply with the directions relating to the sale of assets as provided in the orders of the Supreme Court dated August 31, 2012 and December 5, 2012, and to pass necessary orders for the sale of assets for realisation of the monies due".
Consequently, Sebi's Whole Time Director Prashant Saran ordered personal appearance by Roy and others on April 10 "to ascertain details of their assets to facilitate settling of terms of the proclamation of sale of immovable assets detailed in the attachment orders, in compliance with the directions of the Supreme Court."
The four persons have been further directed to submit, by way of an affidavit on or before April 8, "a list of all their assets and details thereof (including properties, monies, bank accounts etc) enumerated in the attachment orders, situated in India or outside India, including any charge, encumbrance created over them," Sebi said.
Sebi also asked them to produce all original title deeds of their assets and details of bank accounts in India or abroad, along with their income tax returns and wealth tax returns for the financial year 2007-08 onwards.
At their personal hearing on April 10, the four would also need to ascertain details of assets and investments of SIRECL and SHICL. The financial details of these two companies would need to be provided by April 8, Sebi order said.
The two firms have also been asked to submit a list of all their holding firms, subsidiaries, associates, partnerships, special purpose vehicles, cooperative societies etc, forming Sahara group, along with details of their addresses, directors, partners, shareholdings, cross-holdings and partnership shares.
Subrata Roy has already challenged before the SAT the attachment orders of his personal assets and bank accounts and the matter would heard next by the Tribunal on April 13.
Sebi said the four persons, as also the two Sahara firms, "remain in default with the directions contained in the orders of the Supreme Court", while they have also not complied with the regulator's attachment orders of last month.
In its attachment orders, the regulator had ordered freezing of bank accounts and attachment of all properties of two group firms and top executives, including Subrata Roy following Supreme Court orders.
Following the attachment orders by Sebi, the two Sahara firms had again approached the apex court seeking further time to file the documents before the regulator and had also sought the courts's permission to offer security from a credible financial institution of repute.
However, the appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court on February 25.
In August last year, the Supreme Court had asked Sahara group firms to refund the Rs 24,000 crore with 15 per cent interest and had asked Sebi to facilitate the refund.
However, the group in December, 2012 was allowed to pay the money in three instalments, including an immediate payment of Rs 5,120 crore, followed by an instalment of Rs 10,000 crore in the first week of January and remainder by the first week of February 2012.
PTI
-
Shubman Gill Edited World Cup Photo to Remove Sanju Samson? Here's a FACT CHECK -
LPG Cylinder Rules In India: How Many Gas Cylinders Can You Keep At Home Legally? -
Tamil Nadu Election Prediction: Will Vijay's TVK's Defeat DMK? Here's What Astrologer Says -
TN Govt Warns Hotels, Caterers Against Using Domestic LPG Cylinders For Commercial Purpose -
LPG Cylinder Booking Made Easy: How to Refill Your HP, Indane Gas Cylinder By Missed Call, SMS or WhatsApp -
New OTT Releases This Week: 37 New Films/Series In Hindi, Kannada, Tamil, Telugu & Malayalam In March 2nd Week -
Bangalore Gold Silver Rate Today, 13 March 2026: Gold Prices Down; Silver Steady After Market Volatility -
BCCI Breaks Silence On SRH Owner Kavya Maran’s Franchise Buying Pakistan’s Abrar Ahmed In The Hundred -
Gold Rate Today 13 March 2026: IBJA Morning Gold Rates Released; Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Prices -
Tamil Nadu Petrol Stock: Is There A Shortage of Fuel In Chennai? IOCL Issues Clarification -
LPG Shortage: How to Book Gas Cylinder Online and Through Phone Amid Rising Demand -
Netanyahu Warns Iran’s New Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei as Israel–US War Enters Day 13












Click it and Unblock the Notifications