• search
For Quick Alerts
ALLOW NOTIFICATIONS  
For Daily Alerts

Sabarimala verdict: Supreme Court says no urgent hearing on review plea

|

New Delhi, Oct 9: The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled out an urgent hearing of a plea seeking a review of its verdict allowing women into Kerala's Sabarimala temple.

 Representational Image

A bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph had considered the submission of Shylaja Vijayan, president, National Ayyappa Devotees Association through Mathews J Nedumpara, which contended that the five-judge Constitution bench verdict lifting the ban was "absolutely untenable and irrational".

Despite review petition, Kerala government to implement Sabarimala verdict

The apex court said there will be no out of turn hearing of bunch of review petitions against Sabrimala judgment.

"It will be listed in due court," the bench said, adding that in any case, the review petition would be heard in chamber and not in open court. It also said the review petition could only be taken up after the Dussehra vacation.

The review plea was filed by Shylaja Vijayan, the president of the National Ayyappa Devotees Association.

Only a believer could have challenged Sabarimala ban, the greatest judge can't match peoples' voice

In the review plea, it is stated," the petitioners believe that no legal luminary, not even the greatest of jurists or judge, can be a match to the common sense and wisdom of the masses. No judicial pronouncement, even of the highest judicial tribunal in this country can be a match for the voice of the people, the petition stated while terming the original verdict as absolutely untenable, irrational and perverse.

The review petition comes in the wake of the Kerala government refusing to interfere and file an appeal in the Supreme Court. There have been massive protests on the streets questioning the verdict of the SC, which allowed the entry of women of all ages into the temple.

SC throws open doors of Sabarimala Temple to women

On September 28, a five-judge constitution bench headed by then Chief Justice Dipak Misra, had in its 4:1 verdict, said banning the entry of women into the shrine is gender discrimination and that the practice violates rights of Hindu women.

For Daily Alerts

For Breaking News from Oneindia
Get instant news updates throughout the day.

Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X
X
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more