Allahabad High Court Orders Google and Meta to Remove Objectionable Videos Against Jagadguru Rambhadracharya
The Allahabad High Court has instructed Google and Meta to remove objectionable videos targeting Jagadguru Rambhadracharya within 48 hours. The order follows a petition highlighting the spread of defamatory content on social media platforms.
The Allahabad High Court's Lucknow Bench has ordered Meta and Google to remove certain videos from social media within 48 hours. These videos allegedly contain objectionable content about Jagadguru Rambhadracharya, a renowned Ramkatha narrator and Padma Vibhushan awardee. The directive was issued by a division bench of Justice Shekhar B Saraf and Justice Prashant Kumar during a hearing on a petition filed by Sharad Chandra Srivastava and others.

AI-generated summary, reviewed by editors
The petitioners have been instructed to provide the necessary URL links to facilitate the removal of the videos. The next court hearing is set for November 11. The petition accuses Shashank Shekhar of posting derogatory videos on platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram against Rambhadracharya, who also serves as Vice Chancellor of Jagadguru Swami Ram Bhadracharya Divyang University in Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh.
Social Media Regulation Concerns
Despite objections from Rambhadracharya's followers, the videos remain online without any action from the platforms involved. The plea calls for the central and state governments to establish and enforce strict regulations on social media to prevent the spread of defamatory content. The petitioners argue that the content not only defames Rambhadracharya but also mocks his disability, as he lost his eyesight during childhood.
During the court proceedings, the state government revealed that the Office of the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities has acknowledged the issue. A notice has been sent to Shashank Shekhar, requiring him to appear before the commission on October 18. This step underscores the seriousness with which authorities are addressing the matter.
The case highlights ongoing concerns about how social media platforms handle harmful content. It raises questions about their responsibility in moderating such material. The court's directive aims to address these concerns by ensuring swift action against defamatory content online.
As this case progresses, it may set a precedent for how similar issues are handled in the future. The outcome could influence policy changes regarding social media regulation in India, especially concerning content that targets individuals based on their disabilities or personal attributes.
With inputs from PTI
-
Gold Silver Rate Today, 9 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Gold and Silver Ease Slightly After Rally -
Bangalore Gold Silver Rate Today, March 9, 2026: Gold and Silver Prices Fall as US Dollar Strengthens -
Vijay-NDA Alliance On Cards? Pawan Kalyan Reportedly Reaches Out to TVK Chief -
Who Was Mojtaba Khamenei’s Wife Zahra Haddad-Adel and What Do We Know About Her? -
Who Is Aditi Hundia? Viral ‘Girl in Red’ & Ishan Kishan's Girlfriend Spotted During IND vs NZ Final -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 9 March 2026: Latest 24K, 22K Gold And Silver Rates In City -
Kerala Election 2026 Date: When Can You Expect EC To Announce Key Dates of Voting & Counting? -
Chennai MRTS Velachery–St Thomas Mount Line Opening on March 10 Faces Delay; Direct Beach Route to Start Later -
Mumbai Water Supply Cut For 24 Hours: Check Dates, Timings & Areas Affected by BMC Maintenance Disruption -
Hardik Pandya and Girlfriend Mahieka Sharma’s Celebration Video Goes Viral After India’s Win -
Bengaluru Hotels to Shut From Tomorrow March 10 as Commercial LPG Supply Stops -
Trisha's Net Worth: How Rich Is Thalapathy Vijay's Rumoured Girlfriend?












Click it and Unblock the Notifications