N-bill: Panel suggests tripling liability amount

In its report, the parliamentary panel recommended that the operators liability in case of an accident must be increased to Rs 1,500 crore (approximately $322 million).
Congress' T Subbarami Reddy, the chairman of the committee, informed that the report has recommended that the right to claim compensation should be increased from 10 years to 20 years.
The panel also suggests that the right to recourse against the supplier be made stringent. Mr Reddy added that the principle of no fault and strict liability of operator should be explicitly stated in the bill.
"The operator's liabilities should be increased from Rs 500 crore to Rs 1,500 crore and the government may increase the liability of an operator but in no case can decrease it," Reddy said.
The main objective of the bill is to provide for a mechanism of prompt payment of compensation to the victims in case of a nuclear accident, he informed insisting that it was not devised so as to appease the United States.
Other recommendations and observations of the panel report are listed below:
- The report has categorically suggested that the bill applies only to nuclear installations owned and controlled by the central government or through any authority or corporation established by it or a government company as defined by the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.
- The report seeks to clarify that there will be no private operator of a nuclear installation in India
- Expanding the definition of nuclear damage has been suggested so that it can include the immediate and long-term health impact on a person and loss of life and personal injury, as also including the word environment as defined by the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
- The maximum amount of liability for a nuclear accident should be 300 Special Drawing Rights (SDR) or such higher amount as may be notified by the central government from time to time
- The committee has recommended a modification in clause 17 of the bill so that the right of recourse against suppliers can be made more stringent
- The suggested modification reads, "The nuclear incident has resulted as a consequence of latent or patent defect, supply of sub-standard material, defective equipment or services or from the gross negligence on the part of supplier of the material, equipment or services."
- The operator must secure his interests through appropriate provisions in the contract with the supplier
- Appointment of a Claims Commissioner and a Nuclear Damage Claims Commission to dispose off claims within three months
OneIndia News
-
“No Kings” Movement Rallies Nationwide as Protesters Challenge Trump Agenda -
Trump Says US Could Seize Iran’s Oil, Hints At Targeting Kharg Island Amid Escalating Middle East Conflict -
Rupee Falls to Fresh Record Low of 95.14 per Dollar Amid RBI FX Rule Changes -
Trump Claims Iran Has Accepted Most of US 15-Point Peace Plan, Signals Possible Breakthrough -
Trump Hints At Breakthrough With Iran Amid War Escalation, Calls Recent Move A ‘Sign Of Respect’ -
Congress Says Pakistan Becoming A ‘Dalaal’ Exposes Colossal Failure Of Modi Government’s Foreign Policy -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 29 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Update On Gold, Silver Rates Across India -
Gold Rate Today 29 March 2026: Latest IBJA Rates With Tanishq, Kalyan, Malabar, Joyalukkas Prices -
Bengali Actor Rahul Arunoday Banerjee Dies At 43 After Reported Drowning In Digha -
Who Is Rajat Dalal’s Wife? Bigg Boss 18 Fame Star Announces Wedding, Shares Dreamy Photos -
Tamil Nadu Elections 2026: TVK Announces Candidate List; Vijay To Contest From Perambur And Trichy East -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 29 March 2026: Gold And Silver Continue Upward Trend After Recent Dip












Click it and Unblock the Notifications