US House Moves to Ban TikTok Unless Chinese Ownership Changes
The US House of Representatives passed legislation on Saturday to ban TikTok if its China-based owner, ByteDance Ltd., does not sell its stake within a year. The decision came as part of a larger foreign aid package, with broad congressional support for Ukraine and Israel. The modified measure now goes to the Senate after negotiations that produced a compromise.

Even if the legislation becomes law, ByteDance would have up to a year to find a buyer and would likely challenge the law in court, arguing it would deprive the app's millions of users of their First Amendment rights. Court challenges could significantly delay the timeline set out by Congress or block the law from going into effect.
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said in a video last month, "We will not stop fighting and advocating for you. We will continue to do all we can, including exercising our legal rights, to protect this amazing platform that we have built with you."
The bill's quick path through Congress is extraordinary because it targets one company and because Congress has taken a hands-off approach to tech regulation for decades. Lawmakers had failed to act despite efforts to protect children online, safeguard users' privacy, and make companies more liable for content posted on their platforms, among other measures.
The TikTok ban reflects widespread concerns from lawmakers about China. Members of both parties, along with intelligence officials, have worried that Chinese authorities could force ByteDance to hand over American user data or direct the company to suppress or boost TikTok content favourable to its interests.
TikTok has denied assertions that it could be used as a tool of the Chinese government and has said it has not shared US user data with Chinese authorities. The US government has not publicly provided evidence that shows TikTok shared US user data with the Chinese government or tinkered with the company's popular algorithm, which influences what Americans see.
ByteDance has good reason to think a legal challenge could be successful, having seen some success in previous legal fights over its operations in the US. In November, a federal judge blocked a Montana law that would ban TikTok use across the state after the company and five content creators who use the platform sued. In 2020, federal courts blocked an executive order issued by then-President Donald Trump to ban TikTok after the company sued on the grounds that the order violated free speech and due process rights.
Dozens of states and the federal government have put in place TikTok bans on government devices. Texas ban was challenged last year by The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which argued in a lawsuit that the policy was impeding academic freedom because it extended to public universities. In December, a federal judge ruled in favor of the state.
Organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union have backed the app. "Congress cannot take away the rights of over 170 million Americans who use TikTok to express themselves, engage in political advocacy, and access information from around the world," said Jenna Leventoff, a lawyer for the group.
Since mid-March, TikTok has spent USD 5 million on TV ads opposing the legislation, according to AdImpact, an advertising tracking firm. The ads have included a range of content creators, including a nun, extolling the positive impacts of the platform on their lives and arguing a ban would trample on the First Amendment.
The company has also encouraged its users to contact Congress, and some lawmakers have received profanity-laced calls. "It is unfortunate that the House of Representatives is using the cover of important foreign and humanitarian assistance to once again jam through a ban bill that would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans, devastate 7 million businesses, and shutter a platform that contributes USD 24 billion to the US economy annually," said Alex Haurek, a spokesman for the company.
Nadya Okamoto, a content creator who has roughly 4 million followers on TikTok, said she has been having conversations with other creators who are experiencing "so much anger and anxiety" about the bill and how it's going to impact their lives. The 26-year-old makes most of her income from TikTok through her company "August," which sells menstrual products and is known for her advocacy around destigmatizing menstrual periods. "This is going to have real repercussions," she said.












Click it and Unblock the Notifications