Snoopgate row: Gujarat HC quashes government's probe panel on family's request

As per a TOI report, the HC quashed the probe panel's appointment in response to a petition filed by the architect's father Pranlal Soni, who demanded to put an end to the issue on the ground that the existence and functioning of this commission are in breach of his family's privacy.
Soni filed the petition on Thursday and Justice Paresh Upadhyay heard the case, sought the state government's opinion and quashed the setting up of the probe panel.
Earlier on May 7, the woman moved the Supreme Court along with her father for restraining the Centre and state government from going ahead with their commissions of inquiry.
The joint-petition, filed by them, was mentioned before a bench comprising Justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and NV Ramana, which said it cannot pass an interim order for staying proceedings without hearing the parties.
The bench issued notices to the Centre and the Gujarat Government seeking their replies for hearing on May 9. The petition also sought protection of their fundamental right to privacy and right to live with dignity.
The apex court also requested the media not to make public the name of the woman.
A controversy broke out last year when two news portals released CDs of purported telephonic conversations between Narendra Modi aide Amit Shah, who was then state Home Minister, and two top state police officials relating to snooping on a woman architect in 2009.
The conversations, purportedly between August and September 2009, do not specifically mention Modi by name but refers to a 'saheb', which the portals claimed was the Gujarat Chief Minister at whose instance the snooping was done, a charge denied by Shah.
While the Gujarat government constituted an inquiry commission in November last year, the Union Cabinet also decided to follow suit. However, a major controversy broke out when in first week of May, senior ministers announced that the name of the judge to head the commission would be announced.
The central government beat a retreat after two allies of the Congress objected to such a move in the "dying days" of UPA II.
The petitioners also pleaded that the state government be asked not to proceed with the proceedings of the commission constituted by it on November 26, 2013.
(With inputs from agencies)
-
Thunderstorm Warning In Delhi NCR: IMD Issues Orange Alert Amid Sudden Weather Shift -
UP STF Nabs Maulana Abdullah Salim Over Controversial Comment On CM Yogi's Mother -
Masood Azhar’s Brother Mohammad Tahir Dies In Pakistan Under Mysterious Circumstances, Cause Yet To Be Known -
VerSe Innovation Appoints P.R. Ramesh as Independent Director and Chair of Audit Committee to Strengthen Governance Ahead of Next Phase of Growth -
“Not Going To Be There Too Much Longer”: Trump Signals Endgame In Iran War -
Iran Threatens To Hit US Companies in Region From April 1, Names Microsoft, Apple, Tesla, Boeing -
‘IPL Official’ Found Dead in Mumbai Hotel, Probe Underway -
Leander Paes To Contest West Bengal Assembly Elections 2026? Tennis Star Joins BJP Ahead of Assembly Polls -
April 1 Rule Changes: PAN, New Tax Law, ATM, FASTag, Cards to Impact Millions, What’s Changing? -
China, Pakistan Call for Immediate Ceasefire in Iran War, Push Peace Talks ‘As Soon As Possible’ -
Iran’s New Hormuz Plan Targets Global Shipping with Tolls, What Does It Mean? -
Are Banks Closed or Open Today on Mahavir Jayanti? RBI Issues Special March 31 Instructions












Click it and Unblock the Notifications