SC won’t interfere with restrictions in J&K, says Govt needs time
New Delhi, Aug 13: The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the restrictions imposed in Jammu and Kashmir in the aftermath of Section 370 being abrogated.
The court said that it would not interfere in the issue for now and adjourned the matter by 2 weeks.

The court sought to know from the Attorney General K K Venugopal as to how long it would take to restore normal services in J&K. The AG said that the situation is being reviewed on a daily basis. It is a preventive step, he also said.
Venugopal cited the Burhan Wani incident and said that 46 persons had died in its aftermath. The situation in J&K is dynamic and a certain section is waiting for an opportunity.
The court observed that the the government must be given sometime to restore normalcy in J&K. A real picture must emerge, before the court can pass any order. Every pros and cons must be considered in a matter like this. Who will be responsible if something really bad happens tomorrow.
The government too would want normalcy as soon as possible the Bench observed.
The court also criticised the petition filed by Tehseen Poonawala, an activist. It is a badly drafted petition, the court said. Even the petitioner may not know the truth, the court said while adding that it is a badly drafted petition.
The court was hearing a petition filed by Anuradha Bhasin, the executive editor of Kashmir Times. She had challenged the restrictions on working journalists in the aftermath of Article 370 being scrapped.
Another plea filed by Congress activist Tehseen Poonawalla is listed for hearing before a bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra, M R Shah and Ajay Rastogi.
He has sought a direction from the top court for the release of leaders like former chief ministers Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti, who are under detention.
He has further sought setting up of a judicial commission to inquire into ground realities there.
The activist has claimed that the decisions that have been taken by the Centre violate fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution.
"The inhabitants of the state of J&K are suffering on account of unwarranted imposition of curfew and/ or restrictions under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, preventive arrests, snapping of phone lines, suspension of internet services, media gag,barred access to healthcare, educational institutions, banks, public offices, shops and establishments and all other basic amenities," the plea said.
-
Delete Privacy-Violating Audio Clip In 24 Hours Or Face Legal Action: Rashmika After Old Video Linking Rakshit -
Instagram Down? Users Report DMs or Messaging Glitches as Complaints Cross 10,000 -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 12 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Gold Stays Strong While Silver Slips -
Gold Rate Today 11 March 2026: Fresh IBJA Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Jewellery Prices -
Gold Rate Today 12 March 2026: IBJA Issues New Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Prices -
UPSC Result: Astha Jain’s Rank 9 Achievement Sparks EWS Quota Debate -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 11 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Gold Gains As Silver Climbs Across India -
LPG Cylinder Booking Made Easy: How to Refill Your HP, Indane Gas Cylinder By Missed Call, SMS or WhatsApp -
RCB Unbox Event 2026: Bengaluru’s Chinnaswamy Stadium to Host Season Launch on March 20 or 22 -
LPG Cylinder Rules In India: How Many Gas Cylinders Can You Keep At Home Legally? -
Bangalore Gold Silver Rate Today, March 11, 2026: Gold Prices Jump, Silver Steady as Global Tensions Push Safe -
Men Are The Biggest Victims: Jayam Ravi Amid Vijay-Sangeetha Divorce Row Linked To Trisha












Click it and Unblock the Notifications