Beef ban in Maharashtra: No plan to ban slaughter of goats; it is only for cows, bulls and bullocks

Mumbai, April 7: A day after the Bombay High Court asked the government that why animals like goats do not figure in its ban on cattle slaughter, there is some news which will bring relief to the people who were worried by th enews.

As per a IBNlive report, "Attorney general Sunil Manohar has clarified that he never suggested extending the ban to include goats or any other animal."

Beef ban was ordred by the

government in 2015 which was followed by Haryana.

The Bombay High Court on Monday mooted a licence policy by which import of meat of cows and bulls slaughtered outside the state can be permitted.

A division bench of justices VM Kanade and AR Joshi was hearing a bunch of petitions challenging a provision under Section 5 (d) of the recently amended Maharashtra Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act which bans possession and consumption of meat of animals like cows and bulls.

According to the petitions, the flesh of these animals, if slaughtered outside Maharashtra, should be allowed inside the state.

"Why has the state banned only cows, bulls and bullocks? What about other animals like goat?" the bench asked.

To this, Advocate General Sunil Manohar said the government was considering it.

"This is just the start (banning of cows, bulls and bullocks). We may consider banning slaughter of other animals too. As of now the state felt it was necessary to protect cows, bulls and bullocks," he said.

The court also suggested that the government have a licence policy by which import of meat of cattle slaughtered outside the state can be permitted.

"Section 5 (d) of the Act which is under challenge does not prohibit slaughter of cattle outside the state. Why should a person be prevented to eat or possess beef that has been slaughtered outside? Indirectly you (government) are prohibiting slaughter of animals outside the state too," Justice Kanade said.

Senior counsel Aspi Chinoy, appearing for one of the petitioners, argued that section 5 (d) of the Act was arbitrary and against the fundamental right of a citizen and that if the object of the Act was to preserve cattle in Maharashtra, then import of meat should be allowed. A report in The Times of India also said that the petitioners claimed that the beef ban violated the right to eat, which came under the fundamental right to life.

Advocate General Manohar, however, objected and said, "How can the state say slaughter of cattle in Maharashtra amounts to cruelty but one can slaughter outside the state? That would also amount to cruelty. The Act incidentally prohibits import also."

The bench directed the government to file its affidavit in reply to the petitions and posted the hearing on 20 April.

OneIndia News

(With inputs from agencies)