CJI D Y Chandrachud Emphasises Differences Between Media Portrayals and Legal Case Merits

The Chief Justice of India, D Y Chandrachud, highlighted the difference between media portrayals and the actual merits of legal cases. He addressed concerns about delays in hearing the bail plea of former JNU student Umar Khalid, who is imprisoned in a Delhi riots case. The CJI emphasised that judges make decisions based on case merits without bias.

Chandrachud noted that media often amplifies certain aspects of cases, leading to criticism of the judiciary. He stated that upon assuming his role, he prioritised bail cases due to their impact on personal liberty. Each Supreme Court bench was tasked with hearing at least 10 bail cases. From November 9, 2022, to November 1, 2024, the court handled 21,358 bail cases out of 21,000 filed.

Focus on Bail Cases and Judicial Independence

During this timeframe, the Supreme Court also disposed of 901 out of 967 Prevention of Money Laundering Act cases. Chandrachud mentioned that several political cases have seen bail granted recently. He stressed that media narratives often differ from judicial findings when judges review case records.

At an event by the Indian Express group, Chandrachud shared his philosophy on granting bail. "Speaking for myself, I have granted bail from A to Z Arnab Goswami to Zubair and that's my philosophy," he stated. He reiterated that the principle of 'bail is the rule and jail is the exception' should be more prevalent in trial courts.

Challenges Faced by Judiciary

The CJI pointed out pressure groups attempting to influence court decisions through electronic media. These groups often label judges as independent only if verdicts align with their interests. Chandrachud argued that true independence allows judges to decide cases according to their conscience.

He further explained that perceptions of judicial independence fluctuate based on case outcomes. "When you decide electoral bonds, then you are very independent but if a verdict goes in favour of the government, then you are not independent," he remarked.

Chandrachud's comments underscore the challenges faced by the judiciary in maintaining impartiality amidst external pressures and media scrutiny. His focus remains on ensuring justice is served based on facts rather than public opinion or media narratives.