Justice S Muralidhar Addresses Media Independence and Corporate Influence in India

Justice S Muralidhar, former chief justice of the Orissa High Court, recently highlighted the ongoing struggle for media independence in India. He noted that many mainstream media outlets are owned by large corporations or political parties. Speaking at the BG Verghese Memorial Lecture on "Media, Courts, and Freedom of Expression," he stressed the importance of media holding power accountable.

The media's role in holding power accountable is compromised when it is influenced by corporate and political interests. Justice Muralidhar pointed out that major print and electronic media houses are largely controlled by these entities. This control poses significant challenges to independent journalism, as these outlets often depend on government advertisements, corporate sponsorships, and political patronage.

Challenges Facing Independent Journalism

Justice Muralidhar expressed concerns about the increasing constraints on independent journalism. He noted that while the information and broadcasting minister described the Indian press as robust, this does not necessarily mean it is free or independent. The reliance on commercial interests has led to self-censorship and prioritisation of profit over journalistic integrity.

He referenced Joseph Pulitzer's warning about the dangers of viewing the press solely as a business venture. In India today, the pursuit of TRPs and corporate funding threatens independent journalism. Justice Muralidhar highlighted how this environment fosters a media landscape where journalistic integrity is often compromised.

Corporate Influence and Editorial Independence

A significant concern raised was the alignment of mainstream media with governmental establishments. Justice Muralidhar recalled a panel discussion where a senior lawyer and ruling party MP dismissed concerns about media bias. They argued that corporate-controlled media was merely exercising its choice to support the government.

Justice Muralidhar suggested that this choice often results from pressure rather than genuine editorial independence. Despite these challenges, he remains optimistic about the resilience of independent journalists who continue to report fearlessly.

Examples of Fearless Journalism

He cited the Panama Papers as an example of fearless investigative reporting. This investigation exposed illicit financial dealings by global elites through collaboration among over 370 journalists from 76 countries. Such cross-border coalitions demonstrate how independent journalism can counteract suppression.

Justice Muralidhar also acknowledged digital media's role in providing alternative spaces for independent journalism. The internet and social media allow journalists to engage directly with audiences, bypassing traditional gatekeepers.

The Role of Digital Media

While digital platforms are not free from state scrutiny, they have enabled courageous voices to emerge and challenge power. Justice Muralidhar noted that these platforms offer opportunities for journalists to connect with their audiences without relying on traditional media structures.

He also discussed the judiciary's relationship with the press, emphasising that an independent media is crucial for a functioning democracy. The judiciary relies on a free press to ensure transparency and accountability within democratic systems.

Justice Muralidhar concluded by expressing hope for the future of independent journalism in India. Despite challenges posed by corporate and political influences, he believes that resilient journalists will continue to uphold journalistic integrity and accountability.