Judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav Hate Speech Case: Rajya Sabha To Form Panel To Probe Allegations
Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar is expected to establish an inquiry committee to investigate alleged hate speech by Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court. This follows a notice for impeachment submitted by Opposition MPs, which includes 55 signatures. The process of verifying these signatures is currently underway.
In a speech at a VHP event on December 8, Justice Yadav made controversial remarks supporting a Uniform Civil Code and addressing the Muslim community. He stated, "I have no hesitation in saying that this is Hindustan... and the country will run according to the majority who live in Hindustan." His comments have sparked significant backlash.

Impeachment Process Underway
The impeachment motion requires at least 50 Rajya Sabha MPs or 100 Lok Sabha MPs to sign the resolution, as per the Judges Inquiry Act. On March 21, Dhankhar mentioned that two emails had been sent to MPs for signature verification. He noted, "Of the 55 members who signed the representation, a member's signature appears on two occasions and the member concerned has denied his signature."
Opposition sources indicated that duplicate signatures resulted from misunderstandings during signing. They prepared three sets of representations for submission. Despite one invalid signature, they believe enough valid signatures exist to proceed with impeachment.
Constitutional Obligations and Procedures
On February 13, Dhankhar addressed the House about receiving an undated notice under Article 124 (3) of the Constitution for Justice Yadav's removal. He emphasized that responsibility constitutionally lies with him and potentially with Parliament and the President. He suggested sharing information with the Supreme Court Secretary General.
Article 124 (4) allows Parliament to remove a Supreme Court judge for "proved misbehavior" or "incapacity." Article 218 extends this to High Court judges. The Monsoon Session of Parliament begins on July 21, when further actions may be taken.
Supreme Court's Involvement
Media reports suggest that the Supreme Court acknowledged the incident and requested a report from Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Arun Bhansali. However, after being informed by Rajya Sabha Secretary General P C Mody about pending impeachment proceedings in Parliament, it decided not to pursue further action.
The matter was reportedly discussed during a meeting with floor leaders on March 25. Once signatures are verified, actions can proceed regardless of whether Parliament is in session.
A delegation of Opposition members submitted an impeachment notice against Justice Yadav on December 13, accusing him of hate speech.
-
LPG Crunch: Karnataka Brings New SOPs, Makes PNG Registration Mandatory for Businesses -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 30 March 2026: Check Fresh 24K, 22K, 18K Gold And Silver Prices In City -
Opinion Poll For Kerala Assembly Election 2026: Ldf Strength In Kannur And Kasaragod -
Tamil Nadu Polls 2026: Vijay Reveals Rs 645 Crore Assets, Rs 266 Crore in Banks; Know All His Declaration -
Mumbai Metro Line 9 Set for April 3 Launch, Dahisar-Mira Bhayandar to Get Direct Boost -
Trump Hints At Breakthrough With Iran Amid War Escalation, Calls Recent Move A ‘Sign Of Respect’ -
Rahul Arunoday Banerjee Autopsy Report: Actor Was Underwater For Over An Hour, Sand Found In Lungs -
West Bengal Assembly elections: Election Commission transfers heads of 173 police stations -
Delhi Weather Brings Relief: IMD Issues Yellow Alert For Rain, Thunderstorms And Gusty Winds; Check Forecast -
Tamil Nadu Elections 2026: Vijay Files Nomination Same Day as MK Stalin, Sets Up Symbolic Political Face-Off -
Too Close To Call? 57 Key Seats Could Decide West Bengal Election 2026 As TMC And BJP Gear Up For Tight Battle -
Kim Jong Un Oversees New Solid-Fuel Missile Engine Test, Claims Capability To Reach US Mainland












Click it and Unblock the Notifications