HC okays Uphaar tragedy-based web series
The web series 'Trial By Fire' is based on the book published by the parents who lost their kids in the Uphaar fire tragedy that took place in 1997. The court concluded that it is quite premature as the show in question is yet to even stream.
New Delhi, Jan 13: The High Court of Delhi, which heard the Uphaar fire tragedy case for decades, now heard a plea against the web series being made based on the tragic incident. Interestingly, the Ansals, the owner of the cinema hall who are convicts in the original case, were the appellant this time. Their plea was that the web series 'Trial By Fire' would violate their right to privacy, ensured by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
The web series is based on the book published by the parents who lost their kids in the tragedy that took place in 1997. The Delhi High Court heard Ansal's advocate and concluded that it is quite premature as the show in question is yet to even stream. Therefore, the court cannot ask for any stay on its making. Not just that nobody has watched the show yet, it has not been examined or analysed.

The High Court also held that it's not just about Ansals. Other aspects have also been brought to the court's notice. For instance, the web series touches on issues like systemic failure and how the victims and their families had to go through the cantankerous trial.
What is 'Trial By Fire'?
It's a web series based on the true accident that shook the whole country. Uphaar tragedy is a blot on the system of governance and administration while the long and arduous trial that took place after that in courts was a similar blot on the judicial system. The victims died in the fire but their families died a slow death in the trial that lasted for decades. 'Trial By Fire' is a web series that depicts the ordeal of the families of the victims of the tragedy. Rajshri Deshpande and Abhay Deol are playing the lead roles in the series.
The tragedy that followed the Uphaar tragedy
'Trial By Fire' is essentially a representation of the perspective and opinion of the families of the victims who were burned alive in Uphaar cinema hall fire. The Delhi High Court observed that this is a fictional rendition of the trials and tribulations. Therefore, this cannot, prima facie, be presumed to be defamatory.
Answering to the argument from Ansal's lawyer that characterisation of his client in the movie is not based on public records, was prejudicial to his reputation, the court clarified that the only way to find out whether fears are unfounded is the screening of the movie for the judges to see.
The court gave its strong observation when it said that more fundamentally, their personal experience and perception of the incident or the culpability of the plaintiff would remain their belief, impression and understanding of the entire episode.
-
India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 Final: Five Positive Signs Favouring India Before Title Clash -
IND vs NZ Final Live: When and Where to Watch India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 Title Clash -
Ind vs NZ T20 World Cup 2026: New Zealand Needs 256 Runs To Beat India And Win The World Cup -
UAE Attacks Iran, Becomes 5th Nation To Enter War; Reports Suggest Strike On Iranian Facility -
ICC T20 World Cup 2026 Final: Ricky Martin, Falguni Pathak To Perform At Closing Ceremony, How To Watch -
Who Is Nishant Kumar: Education, Personal Life and Possible Political Role -
IND vs NZ T20 WC Final: New Zealand Win Toss, Opt To Chase; Why Batting First Could Be A Tough Call For India -
Gold Rate Today 8 March 2026: IBJA Issues Fresh Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Kalyan, Joyalukkas Prices -
From Kerala Boy To World Cup Hero: Sanju Samson’s 89-Run Blitz, His Birth, Religion, Wife And Inspiring Story -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 8 March, 2026: Latest Gold Prices And Silver Rate In Nizam City -
Panauti Stadium? Is Narendra Modi Stadium an Unlucky Venue for India National Cricket Team? -
Storm Over West Bengal Govt's 'Snub' To President Droupadi Murmu












Click it and Unblock the Notifications