Complete probe against builders in 90 days, HC tells police
A division bench of the High Court headed by Justice V M Kanade also directed the Police Commissioner to call for explanation from the investigation officer in cases where the chargesheet is not filed
Mumbai, Nov 29: The Bombay High Court has directed the Mumbai Police Commissioner to evolve a mechanism to ensure that investigation of offences, particularly pertaining to complaints against builders and developers, should get over within 90 days as stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code.
A division bench of the High Court headed by Justice V M Kanade also directed the Police Commissioner to call for explanation from the investigation officer in cases where the chargesheet is not filed within the stipulated 90 days.

"An explanation should be called from the investigation officer as to why the investigation is not completed within a reasonable period of time and why chargesheet had not been filed in the stipulated period," said the bench.
The Judges also opined that if the explanation in this regard is not found to be satisfactory, then adverse remarks should be made in Confidential Records of such officers. The High Court was hearing a petition filed by a city developer and other respondents seeking to quash a complaint filed by a resident of a building who was promised a flat after its reconstruction but was sold to another person.
"In the present case, we are informed by the instructing officers that hand writing expert's opinion was not obtained in time and, therefore, the chargesheet was not filed." The bench expressed that this explanation is not satisfactory and opined that directions should be issued to the Police Commissioner to make an enquiry in this case.
However, it refrained from passing any orders because it did want the complainant and her husband to be harassed further and also because if such investigation is made again, they may have to run from pillar to post and visit the office of Police Chief.
"On this ground alone, we do not propose to give such directions," the Judges said in a recent order. One of the petitioners and builder Rajendra Jain, who was present in the court, voluntarily agreed to donate an amount of Rs one lakh to Tata Cancer Research Institute of Mumbai.
The court accepted his offer but directed that the amount should not be paid in currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 denomination as these have been forfeited by the government in the recent demonetisation move.
PTI
-
IPL 2026 Schedule Announcement: Indian Premier League Starts March 28, Final in Bengaluru on May 31 -
Gold Rate Today 9 March 2026: IBJA Benchmark Rates, Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Jewellery Prices -
Hyderabad College Girls To Get Electric Scooters As Telangana Targets Pollution In CURE Region -
Gold Rate Today, 10 March 2026: Check IBJA Gold Prices, Retail Rates At Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 9 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Gold and Silver Ease Slightly After Rally -
Bangalore Gold Silver Rate Today, March 9, 2026: Gold and Silver Prices Fall as US Dollar Strengthens -
Vijay-Trisha's Secret Marriage Photo Leaked Online? Is The Wedding Photo Real Or Fake? -
Chennai MRTS Velachery–St Thomas Mount Line Opening on March 10 Faces Delay; Direct Beach Route to Start Later -
Kerala Election 2026 Date: When Can You Expect EC To Announce Key Dates of Voting & Counting? -
Gas Supply Squeeze May Leave 10 Lakh Bengaluru PG Residents Without Daily Meals -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 10 March 2026: City-Wise Prices Edge Lower While MCX Gold And Silver Stay Range-Bound -
Who Was Mojtaba Khamenei’s Wife Zahra Haddad-Adel and What Do We Know About Her?












Click it and Unblock the Notifications