Centre seeks rejection of review plea on PM CARES Fund
New Delhi, Jan 10: The Centre sought dismissal of a review petition seeking information about funds received by the Prime Minister's Citizens Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situation (PM CARES) Fund.

The Union government told the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court that audit statement of receipt and payment accounts of the PM CARES Fund for 2019-20 was available on the trust's website.
An affidavit was filed by Pradeep Srivastava, Under Secretary in the Prime Minister's Office, before a division bench of Justices Sunil Shukre and Anil Kilor in response to a petition filed by advocate Arvind Waghmare.
Waghmare has sought a review of the High Court's August 2020 order dismissing his plea for declaration of the funds received by PM CARES, a charitable trust set up by the Union government amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
In August, 2020, the High Court, however, dismissed the petition saying since the Public Charitable Trust Act was applicable to the PM CARES Fund, the petitioner was free to resort to the mechanism provided under the Act for redressal of his grievance of public disclosure of funds.
Later, in December, 2020, Waghmare filed a review petition before the High Court, claiming that the Public Charitable Trusts Act was not applicable in Delhi and sought the court to direct the government to disclose details of the funds received and expenditure done.
The Centre, in its affidavit, stated that the review petition was completely "misconceived and is nothing but another attempt at seeking publicity".
It added that no new grounds have been raised in the review petition.
"Audit statement of receipt and payment accounts of PM CARES Fund for the financial year 2019-20 is available on the website of the Trust. As such, the petitioner cannot be said to have any grievances about disclosure of income and expenditure of the funds," the affidavit said.
It further stated that the High Court has already dismissed Waghmare's petition in the past and should now dismiss his review petition with exemplary cost.
The High Court on Saturday heard arguments of all parties and reserved its order on the review plea.
-
Delete Privacy-Violating Audio Clip In 24 Hours Or Face Legal Action: Rashmika After Old Video Linking Rakshit -
Instagram Down? Users Report DMs or Messaging Glitches as Complaints Cross 10,000 -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 12 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Gold Stays Strong While Silver Slips -
Gold Rate Today 11 March 2026: Fresh IBJA Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Jewellery Prices -
Gold Rate Today 12 March 2026: IBJA Issues New Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Prices -
UPSC Result: Astha Jain’s Rank 9 Achievement Sparks EWS Quota Debate -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 11 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Gold Gains As Silver Climbs Across India -
LPG Cylinder Booking Made Easy: How to Refill Your HP, Indane Gas Cylinder By Missed Call, SMS or WhatsApp -
RCB Unbox Event 2026: Bengaluru’s Chinnaswamy Stadium to Host Season Launch on March 20 or 22 -
LPG Cylinder Rules In India: How Many Gas Cylinders Can You Keep At Home Legally? -
Bangalore Gold Silver Rate Today, March 11, 2026: Gold Prices Jump, Silver Steady as Global Tensions Push Safe -
Men Are The Biggest Victims: Jayam Ravi Amid Vijay-Sangeetha Divorce Row Linked To Trisha












Click it and Unblock the Notifications