Candidates beyond 25 years of age can appear for NEET: SC
The apex court also held that if any high court has passed any order contrary to the present order, the CBSE "shall be bound by the order passed by this Court as far as the cut-off date is concerned".
New Delhi, March 31: The Supreme Court on Friday scrapped the upper age limit of 25 years for those aspiring to appear in the National Eligibility Entrance Test for medical education, saying that the CBSE could not have fixed the age limit by way of notice on the MCI's instructions.

Directing that all the candidates desirous to appear in NEET would be allowed to fill up the forms on the online portal of the CBSE by April 5, a bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice A.M. Khanwilkar said, "...we, prima facie, find, such an age limit could not have been determined by way of a notice (by the CBSE) on the basis of the instructions issued by the Medical Council of India ..."
It said that any form submitted beyond April 5 will not be accepted.
Noting that the Central Board of Secondary Education would be facing some difficulty, the court in its order directed that "if the competent authority of the CBSE seeks any logistic support from the agencies for having additional centres", the District Collector or the Commissioner "will extend all the support so that the forms are accepted and the examinations are held on the date fixed..."
The apex court also held that if any high court has passed any order contrary to the present order, the CBSE "shall be bound by the order passed by this Court as far as the cut-off date is concerned".
"No High Court in the country shall interfere with regard to any litigation pertaining to choosing/allocation of centres," it said.
The court order came on the petitions seeking the quashing of January 31, 2017 admission notice that had fixed the maximum age of 25 years for NEET aspirants.
The January 31 notice was issued by the CBSE on the instructions issued by the MCI and approved by the Central Government.
Appearing for the petitioner candidates, senior counsel Amarendra Sharan and Indu Malhotra had contended that in the absence of regulations by the MCI on the age limit, the same could not have been done by merely issuing a notice.
IANS
-
India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 Final: Five Positive Signs Favouring India Before Title Clash -
IND vs NZ Final Live: When and Where to Watch India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 Title Clash -
Ind vs NZ T20 World Cup 2026: New Zealand Needs 256 Runs To Beat India And Win The World Cup -
UAE Attacks Iran, Becomes 5th Nation To Enter War; Reports Suggest Strike On Iranian Facility -
ICC T20 World Cup 2026 Final: Ricky Martin, Falguni Pathak To Perform At Closing Ceremony, How To Watch -
Who Is Nishant Kumar: Education, Personal Life and Possible Political Role -
IND vs NZ T20 WC Final: New Zealand Win Toss, Opt To Chase; Why Batting First Could Be A Tough Call For India -
Gold Rate Today 8 March 2026: IBJA Issues Fresh Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Kalyan, Joyalukkas Prices -
From Kerala Boy To World Cup Hero: Sanju Samson’s 89-Run Blitz, His Birth, Religion, Wife And Inspiring Story -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 8 March, 2026: Latest Gold Prices And Silver Rate In Nizam City -
Panauti Stadium? Is Narendra Modi Stadium an Unlucky Venue for India National Cricket Team? -
Storm Over West Bengal Govt's 'Snub' To President Droupadi Murmu












Click it and Unblock the Notifications