• search
For Quick Alerts
For Daily Alerts

Can Cauvery verdict be implemented in distress year? Karnataka’s counsel explains

By Vicky

The order in the Cauvery Waters dispute came as a major relief to Karnataka after the Supreme Court reduced the quantum of water that it had to share with Tamil Nadu.

Can Cauvery verdict be implemented in distress year? Karnataka’s counsel explains

According to the order Karnataka is to provide 177.2 tmcft of water to Tamil Nadu. As a result of this, the water share for Karnataka was increased by 14.75 tmcft. The court held that the water share was increased keeping in mind the drinking water requirements of the residents of Bengaluru. It also said it was keeping in mind the other industrial activities in the city.

Cauvery water dispute verdict: Karnataka gets more water due to drinking water crisis in Bengaluru

The court said that for the next 15 years Karnataka would be releasing 177.25 tmc ft Cauvery water to TN from Biligundulu every year. There shall be absolutely no deviance shall be shown by any state, the Bench also held.

Mohan Katarki, advocate for Karnataka sounded relieved following the order. I am satisfied with the verdict as it is a balanced one, he told OneIndia.

SC quenches Bengaluru's thirst: Find out how

He said that the order protects the interest of both states. I am happy to the extent that the liability on Karnataka has been reduced, he also added. For Tamil Nadu, the order is a workable one and it is in the interest of the lower riparian. TN can now plan and pull up their socks, he also added.

Cauvery Waters verdict: Explained in 17 points

However the key question would be what happens during a drought year. Can the share of 177.2 tmcft of water be released by Karnataka when the rains fail. Katarki says that there is some discussion on this issue in the 400 page order of the Supreme Court. The distress formula would come into play in such a scenario, he added, while also stating that he would study the order in detail.

Brijesh Kalappa who also appeared for the state of Karnataka said that the judgement is a good one and he is reasonably pleased with it. I am yet to read the entire verdict and once done, I will be in a better position to comment, he said.

On the reduction of water to be shared, he says that court came to the conclusion solely on the water needs of Bengaluru. This is a point we argued upon and managed to impress the court on the same, he also added.

On the Cauvery Management Board, the court has said that it is a purely legislative function. He said that the court would not interfere with it.

OneIndia News

For Daily Alerts
Get Instant News Updates
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more