Cabinet Greenlights 'One Nation, One Election' Plan; Congress Calls It 'Not Practical'
In a significant move towards streamlining India's electoral process, the Union Cabinet has approved the government's ambitious 'one nation, one election' proposal.
This plan aims to synchronize Lok Sabha and Assembly elections, along with urban body and panchayat polls, to be held within a 100-day window.

Why Congress Opposes 'One Nation, One Election'?
The decision follows the recommendations of a high-profile panel led by former President Ram Nath Kovind. The proposal is now set to be presented in Parliament, where it will need to pass both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Additionally, the plan requires a Constitutional amendment and must be ratified by all states and union territories before it can become law, as reported by NDTV.
The panel argues that simultaneous elections will significantly enhance the electoral process and governance while optimizing scarce resources. They believe that consolidating elections will simplify the voting process for citizens, potentially lead to faster economic growth, and stabilize the economy. The panel claims that a single round of elections will allow businesses to make decisions without the concern of abrupt policy changes.
Furthermore, the panel suggests that synchronizing elections across all levels-Lok Sabha, state Assemblies, and panchayats-will mitigate disruptions in supply chains and production cycles caused by migrant workers needing time off to vote. It also contends that holding fewer elections will help prevent policy paralysis and reduce the uncertainty associated with frequent electoral cycles.
The panel's report, submitted in March, drew on best practices from other countries and included consultations with economists and the Election Commission. However, the proposal has faced resistance from 15 political parties, including the Congress.
Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge criticized the plan as "not pragmatic and practical," suggesting that it aims to divert public attention. He asserted that the proposal will not succeed and that the public is unlikely to accept it, as reported by NDTV. As the proposal moves forward, it will be closely watched by political analysts and stakeholders for its potential impact on India's electoral landscape.
-
India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 Final: Five Positive Signs Favouring India Before Title Clash -
IND vs NZ Final Live: When and Where to Watch India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup 2026 Title Clash -
Ind vs NZ T20 World Cup 2026: New Zealand Needs 256 Runs To Beat India And Win The World Cup -
UAE Attacks Iran, Becomes 5th Nation To Enter War; Reports Suggest Strike On Iranian Facility -
ICC T20 World Cup 2026 Final: Ricky Martin, Falguni Pathak To Perform At Closing Ceremony, How To Watch -
Who Is Nishant Kumar: Education, Personal Life and Possible Political Role -
IND vs NZ T20 WC Final: New Zealand Win Toss, Opt To Chase; Why Batting First Could Be A Tough Call For India -
Gold Rate Today 8 March 2026: IBJA Issues Fresh Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Kalyan, Joyalukkas Prices -
From Kerala Boy To World Cup Hero: Sanju Samson’s 89-Run Blitz, His Birth, Religion, Wife And Inspiring Story -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 8 March, 2026: Latest Gold Prices And Silver Rate In Nizam City -
Panauti Stadium? Is Narendra Modi Stadium an Unlucky Venue for India National Cricket Team? -
Storm Over West Bengal Govt's 'Snub' To President Droupadi Murmu












Click it and Unblock the Notifications