• search
For Quick Alerts
ALLOW NOTIFICATIONS  
For Daily Alerts

Ayodhya hearing: Muslim side changed track, counsel for Ram Lalla tells SC

|

New Delhi, Aug 20: Hearing on the Ayodhya case will continue tomorrow in the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya hearing: SC hears arguments on existence of religious structure before Babri Masjid

Senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan, appearing for deity Ram Lalla Virajman began arguments on Tuesday on the evidence on a pre-existence of a religious structure where the Babri Masjid later stood.

Ayodhya: How Ram Lalla, a deity and minor is fighting the case as a juristic person

He said that the Muslim side changed their tracks during the course of the proceedings earlier.

Initially, he said that the Muslim side maintained there was nothing beneath the Babri mosque, but later claimed that the structures found were Islamic.

He said that there is historical evidence to show that Raja Govind Chandra was the ruler of the Saket Mandala in the 12 Century and a massive temple of Vishnu Hari existed at that time.

Vaidyanathan had referred to writings of William Pinch and Joseph Barrell to corroborate his claims on pre-existence of a temple before a mosque was erected at that site. The court sought to know when it was referred to as Babri Masjid to which Vaidyanathan said in the 19th century. Before that there was nothing to show that it was called as Babri Masjid, he said.

Senior counsel, Rajeev Dhavan said that the Babarnama speaks about Babar crossing the river to Ayodhya. Two pages of his stay in Ayodhya are missing. It is not right to say that he did not visit Ayodhya, he also added.

Senior counsel, Rajeev Dhavan said that the Babarnama speaks about Babar crossing the river to Ayodhya. Two pages of his stay in Ayodhya are missing. It is not right to say that he did not visit Ayodhya, he also added.

Vaidyanathan however said that the travelogues of foreigners such as Joseph Tiefenthaler, Montgomery Martin about the history of Ram and ruins of a temple shows the belief of the people.

They were under no compulsion to lie, he also added.

Hearing on the matter will continue on Friday.

Three judges of the Allahabad High Court had held that there was a temple at the disputed site, Vaidyanathan told the bench also comprising Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer.

"Justice SU Khan of the high court had said that the mosque was built on the ruins of the temple," the senior advocate told the bench.

Senior advocate K Parasaran, also appearing for deity 'Ram Lalla Virajman' told the court that it must do "full and complete justice" in all matters before it.

Ayodhya hearing: Muslims don't get ownership merely because they prayed there, SC told

The bench had on Friday last asked as to whether anyone from the 'Raghuvansha' (descendants of Lord Ram) dynasty still resides in Ayodhya.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the Supreme Court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

On December 6, 1992, the Babri Masjid, which was constructed at the disputed site in the 16th century by Shia Muslim Mir Baqi, was demolished.

For Daily Alerts
Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more