Ranjit Sinha row: Why premier investigating agency facing credibility crisis?
Post the Ranjit Sinha episode, two different benches of the Supreme Court have questioned its functioning recently. On September 8, a bench headed by Justice H L Dattu expressed concern over the "fairness of trial in 2G scam cases" following CBI director's alleged rendezvous with scam accused at his residence. On September 9, another bench of the apex court expressed surprise over the gravity of allegations relating to the coal scam cases.
These developments, in the past few months, indicate how the Central probe agency botched up investigations in serious cases acting at behest of its political bosses.
CBI got sobriquet of 'caged parrot' by Supreme Court
Last
year,
the
Supreme
Court
questioned
the
credibility
of
CBI
probe
into
the
coal
scam
and
asked
for
a
thorough
and
qualitative
investigation.
Raising
questions
on
the
independence
of
CBI,
the
apex
court
called
it
a
"caged
parrot
speaking
in
its
master's
voice".
The
apex
court
also
made
scathing
comments
on
the
functioning
of
the
investigating
agency
saying,
"It's
a
sordid
saga
that
there
are
many
masters
and
one
parrot."
This
after
it
came
to
light
that
Ashwani
Kumar,
then
Law
Minister
and
senior
officials
PMO
and
Coal
Ministry
made
certain
changes
in
the
‘status
report,'
on
the
allocation
of
coal
blocks.
During
UPA's
tenure,
the
top
probe
agency
was
criticised
for
working
in
favour
of
the
accused
of
various
scams.
CBI
comes
under
the
Ministry
of
Personnel,
Public
Grievances
and
Pension,
this
provides
ample
scope
for
those
sitting
in
Government
to
interfere
with
the
functioning
of
the
agency.
CBI needs to be given more autonomy
Undoubtedly,
the
recent
controversy
surrounding
the
CBI
chief's
conduct
has
cast
a
shadow
not
just
on
the
agency's
credibility
but
the
system
as
a
whole.
But,
this
is
not
the
first
time
agency's
image
has
been
dented.
For
the
last
10
years,
it
has
been
called
CBI
as
Congress
Bureau
of
Investigation.
Its
style
of
functioning
has
always
been
questioned.
It
is
being
thought
that
most
of
its
status
report
are
influenced
by
the
Ministers
and
the
same
is
going
to
continue
until
its
structure
and
powers
are
revamped.