Udhayanidhi Stalin Gets SC Relief In Controversial 'Sanatana Dharma' Case

The Supreme Court of India has declined to entertain three writ petitions seeking criminal action against Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin over his controversial remarks about 'Sanatana Dharma' in September 2023. The court's decision came on January 27, 2025, when a bench consisting of Justice Bela M Trivedi and Justice Prasanna B Varale expressed reluctance to entertain the petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution, as reported by NDTV.

Photo Credit: PTI

Udhayanidhi Stalin Gets SC Relief: Here's What You Need To Know

Petitioners Seek Legal Action for "Hate Speech"

The petitions, filed by B Jagannath, Vineet Jindal, and the Sanatan Suraksha Parishad, sought legal action against Udhayanidhi Stalin for his comments, where he equated 'Sanatana Dharma' to diseases like dengue and malaria, calling for its eradication. The petitioners argued that Stalin's statement was offensive to their religious sentiments and amounted to "hate speech", as reported by Live Law.

Court Dismisses Petitions but Allows Alternative Remedies

Senior Advocate Dama Seshadri Naidu, representing the petitioners, requested to withdraw the petitions, seeking permission to pursue other legal remedies. The court granted the petitioners the liberty to explore alternative legal avenues and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

Other Figures Involved in the Controversy

Vineet Jindal, one of the petitioners, also sought action against DMK MP A Raja for publicly supporting Udhayanidhi Stalin's remarks. Additionally, the Sanatan Suraksha Parishad called for the establishment of guidelines to prevent communal comments from elected representatives in the future.

Pending Petition by Udhayanidhi Stalin

Udhayanidhi Stalin has also filed a petition seeking the consolidation of various criminal complaints filed against him in different parts of the country. This petition is still pending before the Supreme Court. The controversy surrounding Stalin's comments continues to stir debates about free speech and the limits of expression, particularly when it concerns religious sensitivities in India, as per media reports.

This development marks an important moment in the ongoing legal and public discourse surrounding Udhayanidhi Stalin's controversial statements and their implications for the broader political and social landscape.