Caged parrot remark of court is correct, says CBI chief
"Whatever Supreme Court said is correct," Sinha said today.
"The CBI has become a caged parrot speaking in its master's voice. It's a sordid saga that there are many masters and giving unbridled power to the CBI is not possible. The CBI has become the police force and is in the administrative control of the Central government. CBI investigations have to be independent," the SC had said in its observations on Wednesday.
Yesterday, during the hearing of coal blocks allocation scam draft report and the affidavit filed by Sinha, the three-judge bench headed by Justice RM Lodha asked the government whether it was contemplating a law to make the working of the CBI independent and insulate it from extraneous intrusion and interferences.
It
also
made
it
clear
that
choice
was
with
the
government
and
in
case
government
dithered,
the
court
would
step
in.
The
government
was
given
time
till
July
3
to
file
an
affidavit
on
steps
to
make
the
agency
autonomous.
The SC censured the government saying that even after 15 years of the Vineet Narayan judgement, the "situation in the country has become much worse as far as CBI autonomy is concerned". "What is the CBI? Is it a collaborator or an investigator," the SC asked.
Attorney
General
GE
Vahanvati,
Law
Minister
Ashwani
Kumar
and
the
two
officials
of
the
PMO
and
the
Coal
Ministry
had
been
accused
by
the
CBI
in
its
affidavit
of
suggesting
changes
to
its
report
on
coalgate.
Vahanvati,
however,
sought
to
deflect
charges
against
him,
saying
that
he
never
sought
a
copy
of
the
report
and
that
he
acted
as
per
the
instructions
of
the
Law
Minister.
"My
meeting
with
CBI
officials
took
place
only
on
suggestions
of
the
Law
Minister,"
he
told
SC.
Expressing concern over the Centre's interference in the CBI probe in coal scam and other cases, the SC said, "No substantial progress has been made in the coal scam probe after registration of the case. The CBI must know how to stand up against all pulls and pressures by government and its officials."
The
SC
also
directed
the
CBI
not
to
share
progress
of
probe
or
any
report
or
material
with
anybody
other
than
its
33-member
team
and
Director,
adding,
"The
CBI
Director
and
the
investigating
team
should
have
stood
up
and
denied
any
access
to
two
joint
secretaries
to
draft
status
report.
The
court
wants
to
know
can
the
Law
Minister
ask
CBI
to
show
details
of
probe
or
status
report
in
a
case
involving
people
of
other
ministeries
and
PMO.
Does
it
not
subvert
integrity
of
investigation
if
changes
are
brought
in
status
report
on
suggestion
of
Law
Minister
and
govt
officers?"
The court said that it was the responsibility of the CBI chief to ensure that no access should be granted to any person, including Law Minister, other Union Ministers, law officers, CBI counsel and Department of Prosecution of CBI to probe in coal block scam. "The status report on probe in coalgate shall not be provided to special CBI court where FIR was registered," it said.
The apex court asked for immediate steps be taken to repatriate former DIG Ravi Kant Mishra who was investigating officer in the case and had been transferred to the Intelligence Bureau and added that it will consider various aspects, including setting up of SIT to look after the probe into the case.
OneIndia News