Washington, Dec 2 : Microorganisms in rivers and streams play a crucial role in the global carbon cycle that has not previously been considered, resulting in a probable miscalculation in earlier models.
According to freshwater ecologist Dr. Tom Battin, of the University of Vienna, this has lead to a radical change in our understanding of how rivers and streams deal with organic carbon.
Microorganisms such as bacteria and single celled algae in rivers and streams decompose organic matter as it flows downstream. They convert the carbon it contains into carbon dioxide, which is then released to the atmosphere.
Recent estimates by Battin's team and others conclude there is a net flux, or outgassing, of carbon dioxide from the world's rivers and streams to the atmosphere of at least two-thirds to three-quarters of a gigatonne (Gt) of carbon per year.
This flux has not been taken into account in the models of the global carbon cycle used to predict climate change.
"Surface water drainage networks perfuse and integrate the landscape, across the whole planet, but they are missing from all global carbon cycling, even from the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) reports," said Battin.
"Rivers are just considered as inert pipelines, receiving organic carbon from Earth and transporting it to the ocean," he added.
This thinking, according to Battin, has changed radically in last few years.
He argues that the latest estimates of how much carbon is transferred to the atmosphere from rivers and streams are very conservative.
"The actual outgassing of carbon dioxide is probably closer to 2 Gt of carbon per year," said Battin.
"Our surface area estimates only consider larger streams and rivers, because it is very hard to estimate accurately the surface area of small streams. So, small streams are excluded, although in terms of microbial activity, they are the most reactive in the network," he added.
Two gigatonnes of carbon per year is close to half the estimated net primary production of the world's vegetation each year.
According to the researchers, realising that this quantity of carbon may be delivered straight back to the atmosphere, rather than being taken to the ocean where some of it is removed by marine organisms and ends up in sediment, could have profound consequences for our understanding of the system.