IAEA pushes Iran to accept cameras at key atom site
Vienna,
Mar
30:
The
International
Atomic
Energy
Agency
is
pushing
Iran
to
agree
to
cameras
in
its
underground
nuclear
plant
within
days
and
Western
states
are
mulling
whether
to
seek
a
crisis
IAEA
meeting
if
Tehran
refuses,
diplomats
said.
The
UN
Security
Council
widened
sanctions
against
Iran
last
week
after
it
defied
a
second
deadline
for
it
to
stop
enriching
uranium,
which
Iran
says
will
yield
solely
electricity
but
world
powers
fear
is
a
disguised
atomic
bomb
programme.
Tehran,
disputing
any
obligation
to
do
so,
has
refused
to
let
the
UN
watchdog
set
up
cameras
in
the
Natanz
plant
where
it
has
installed
about
a
third
of
3,000
centrifuges
it
plans
to
have
running
by
May
to
launch
''industrial
scale''
enrichment.
The
dispute
over
Iran's
nuclear
programme
has
been
overshadowed
by
Tehran's
capture
of
15
British
naval
personnel.
Some
analysts
have
suggested
Iran
seized
the
British
sailors
in
order
to
distract
world
attention
from
the
nuclear
issue.
Diplomats
familiar
with
IAEA
operations
said
the
agency's
director
for
nuclear
safeguards,
Olli
Heinonen,
had
written
to
Tehran
pressing
it
to
relent
on
cameras
within
days,
with
the
end
of
March
in
mind
as
the
target
for
a
positive
answer.
Such
cameras,
which
the
IAEA
wants
to
stream
images
straight
to
its
Vienna
headquarters,
are
seen
by
inspectors
as
vital
to
helping
them
verify
Iran
does
not
enrich
uranium
to
high
levels
suitable
for
bomb
fuel,
or
divert
materials
towards
that
end.
Iran
denies
any
such
intent
and
has
said
such
intrusive
surveillance
goes
beyond
its
basic
safeguards
commitment
with
the
IAEA,
while
saying
it
hopes
disputes
over
the
extent
of
monitoring
at
the
plant
can
be
settled
to
mutual
satisfaction.
But
doubt
over
Iran's
intentions
prevails
abroad
since
it
hid
sensitive
enrichment
research
from
the
IAEA
for
18
years
and
continues
to
stonewall
agency
inquiries
meant
to
determine
whether
its
programme
is
wholly
peaceful
or
not.
Diplomats
said
a
number
of
the
IAEA
board's
35
member
nations
met
on
Tuesday
with
some
Western
envoys
mooting
whether
a
crisis
board
meeting
might
be
needed
to
declare
Iran
in
non-compliance
with
safeguards
rules
for
blocking
cameras.
'Grey
areas'
''The
meeting
was
inconclusive.
There
was
no
consensus
over
the
legalities.
It's
a
matter
of
interpretation.
The
Iranians
are
very
good
at
exploiting
legal
grey
areas
and
there
are
grey
areas
here,''
said
one
senior
diplomat
accredited
to
the
IAEA.
Diplomats
said
IAEA
experts
were
re-examining
the
fine
print
of
Iran's
cooperation
accords
with
the
agency.
Board
members
would
be
scrutinising
Iran's
response
to
Heinonen's
concerted
approach
in
the
next
few
days
before
trying
to
work
out
a
course
of
action,
they
added.
The
United
States
denied
reports
that
it
was
lobbying
for
a
special
meeting
to
haul
Iran
on
the
carpet
again,
a
year
after
the
governors
referred
Iran
to
the
Security
Council
over
its
defiance
of
calls
to
suspend
enrichment
as
a
confidence-building
measure
and
its
lack
of
cooperation
with
IAEA
investigations.
''The
US
mission
is
closely
monitoring
developments
related
to
Iran's
nuclear
activities,
including
(the
camera
issue),
and
is
in
regular
consultation
with
other
missions,''
said
US
mission
spokesman
Matthew
Boland.
''We
strongly
support
the
agency's
efforts
to
safeguard
nuclear
material
in
Iran
and
investigate
troubling
issues
about
Iran's
programme,''
he
said.
The
latest
IAEA
report
on
Iran
issued
a
month
ago
said
the
the
agency
had
struck
a
deal
with
the
Islamic
Republic
for
more
frequent
inspector
visits
to
Natanz
to
improve
transparency.
But
it
said
Iran
had
been
informed
that
remote
monitoring
would
be
required
once
the
number
of
centrifuges
exceeded
500.
Iran
has
said
this
stance
has
no
legal
foundation.
Angered
over
broader
sanctions
imposed
on
Saturday,
Iran
announced
it
will
no
longer
give
the
IAEA
early
word
of
plans
to
build
nuclear
installations,
backing
out
of
a
voluntary
2002
agreement
supplementing
its
1974
basic
safeguards
treaty.
The
move
symbolised
growing
IAEA
difficulty
in
tracking
Iran's
nuclear
activity.
Last
year
Iran
cancelled
voluntary
compliance
with
snap
inspections
at
sites
not
declared
to
be
nuclear.
In
January
it
banned
38
inspectors
from
Western
states,
handicapping
the
200-member
contingent
assigned
to
work
in
Iran.
Reuters
Related Stories
Sanctions against Iran 'counter-productive': Pak