Bush backs away from claim on Iran

By Staff
|
Google Oneindia News

WASHINGTON, Feb 14 (Reuters) President George W Bush today backed away from a U.S. claim that Iran's leaders directed an effort to give bomb devices to Iraqi militants and said he was not using the charges as a pretext for a war with Iran.

Bush also said he was prepared for a fight with the Democratic-controlled US Congress if lawmakers attempted to cut off funding for US troops in Iraq.

''I think you can be against my decision and support the troops, absolutely,'' he told a White House news conference.

''But the proof will be whether or not you provide them the money necessary to do the mission.'' Bush said he was confident that the Quds Force, an elite unit of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, provided explosive devices to Iraqi militants but admitted he did not know if Iran's leaders were behind the effort.

''I don't think we know,'' he said.

His admission came days after US officials in Baghdad charged that officials at the ''highest levels'' of Tehran's government were involved in arming Iraqi militants -- an accusation that Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, declined to embrace.

Bush is facing skepticism about the charge because his 2002 claims that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction proved false. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has denied that Iran is supplying sophisticated weapons to Iraqi militants.

His voice rising with emotion, Bush said the United States was not pushing the claim as a ''pretext for war.'' He vowed to shut down the networks responsible for the weapons.

''The idea that somehow we're manufacturing the idea that the Iranians are providing IEDs (improvised explosive devices) is preposterous. My job is to protect our troops. And when we find devices that are in that country that are hurting our troops, we're going to do something about it, pure and simple.'' he said.

Bush's deployment of 21,500 more US troops prompted Congress to debate nonbinding resolutions opposing the move.

The House of Representatives this week is debating its version, and Bush was resigned to a vote against his policy.

''Somebody who doesn't agree with my policy is just as patriotic a person as I am,'' he said.

Bush said while he understood that lawmakers had differences of opinion about his plan, he questioned why they would reject a strategy being carried out by Gen. David Petraeus, who the Senate confirmed last week as the top US commander in Iraq.

Bush's reworked policy is taking effect as a new series of devastating suicide bombings convulse Baghdad with hundreds of deaths.

The debate in Congress is between Democrats who say Americans have lost faith in the Iraq war and Bush's Republican allies who say it will undermine the US struggle with terrorism. So far, none of the resolutions have talked of cutting off funds, but Congress soon will start debate on Bush's 100 billion dollar budget request to fund US forces.

For the first time, Bush said he would like eventually to adopt recommendations of a bipartisan panel, led by former Secretary of State James Baker and ex-congressman Lee Hamilton, whose advice he had shrugged off in forming his new policy.

''I thought that Baker-Hamilton made a lot of sense -- their recommendations. We just weren't able to get there if the capital was up in flames,'' Bush said.

He did not say which recommendations he would like to adopt. The panel had proposed direct talks with Iran and Syria.

Asked directly why he would not hold talks with Ahmadinejad, Bush said he would only do so if results could be achieved and that he wanted to maintain allied pressure on Iran to give up a drive for nuclear weapons that Tehran denies.

''This is a world in which people say, 'Meet! Sit down and meet!' And my answer is: If it yields results, that's what I'm interested in,'' he said.

Reuters AD VP0115

For Daily Alerts
Get Instant News Updates
Enable
x
Notification Settings X
Time Settings
Done
Clear Notification X
Do you want to clear all the notifications from your inbox?
Settings X
X