New Delhi, Nov 14: The Supreme Court has rejected the review petitions in the Rafale case. A review petition had been filed challenging the clean chit given to the NDA government in the purchase of 36 fully loaded Rafale jets from France under the inter-governmental deal.
The top court has closed the contempt case against Rahul Gandhi in which he attributed his remark, Chowkidar Chor Hai to the Rafale judgment of the Supreme Court.
Follow all the updates here:
Newest FirstOldest First
4:19 PM, 14 Nov
Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala once again reiterated his party's nine questions on Rafale deal.
3:54 PM, 14 Nov
"Today’s decision,yet again,reaffirms Modi sarkar’s credentials as a govt which is transparent and corruption free," he adds.
3:53 PM, 14 Nov
SC’s decision to dismiss the review petition on Rafale is a befitting reply to those leaders and parties who rely on malicious and baseless campaigns, says Home Minister Amit Shah.
2:25 PM, 14 Nov
Prasad said,
'It is recognition of the honest decision making process of the Narendra Modi government...Satayamav Jayete. The Congress party must apologise and Rahul Gandhi in particular must apologise to the country."
2:24 PM, 14 Nov
Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad asked Rahul for an apology and said the BJP wished to know who was behind the Congressman's campaign.
1:25 PM, 14 Nov
Hope the matter is now laid to rest. Raking up such issues to get political gains, putting the interest of your armed forces behind, I think is not right, he says
1:21 PM, 14 Nov
BS Dhanoa, former chief of the Air Staff: I think we have been vindicated. In December 2018 I had issued a statement that Supreme Court has given a fine judgement and at that time some people said that I was being political, which was incorrect.
12:59 PM, 14 Nov
I wholeheartedly welcome the Supreme Court’s categorical dismissal of the review petitions in the Rafale case and with this pronouncement the NDA Government stands vindicated. The SC verdict is also a judgement on our Government’s transparency in decision making.
SC verdict huge victory for Narendra Modi led govt, says BJP general secretary (organisation) B L Santhosh.
12:47 PM, 14 Nov
From road to Parliament, Rahul Gandhi and his party tried hard to mislead the country on this issue but truth prevailed. I wish Rahul Gandhi would be in country and should offer apologies to nation, says BJP working president, JP Nadda.
12:09 PM, 14 Nov
"Truth triumphs. Truth can be bothered but not defeated," BJP spokesperson Shahnawaz Hussain said.
12:09 PM, 14 Nov
The BJP on Thursday reacted with jubilation to the Supreme Court's decision to reject review petitions for probing the Rafale deal, saying truth has triumphed and that it is a huge victory for the Modi government.
11:54 AM, 14 Nov
Recting to Rafale verdict, BJP leader GVL Narsimha Rao says "Hope that after today's SC verdict court hearing was a slap to Congress' and Rahul Gandhi's face, hope that after today's erdict, Rahul Gandhi will be more careful."
11:07 AM, 14 Nov
While closing the contempt case against Rahul Gandhi, the SC said that he should be more careful in future. He uttered the words, Chowkidar Chor Hai, without even reading the Rafale judgment of the Supreme Court dated December 2018.
11:06 AM, 14 Nov
Justice S K Kaul who read out the verdict said that there are no grounds to order an FIR. The court cannot initiate a roving and fishing inquiry. There are no grounds for an FIR, the court said while rejecting the review petitions.
11:03 AM, 14 Nov
The court also closed the contempt plea against Rahul Gandhi. The court said that Rahul Gandhi needs to be more careful in future for attributing to the court his remarks.
11:01 AM, 14 Nov
With the review petitions being rejected, the earlier order of the court that gave the government a clean chit remains in force.
11:01 AM, 14 Nov
The Supreme Court said that there is no ground to order an FIR into the procurement of the Rafale jets. No merit in plea seeking probe into defence deal says SC.
10:59 AM, 14 Nov
SC rejects review petitions in Rafale case.
10:17 AM, 14 Nov
The verdict will be delivered by a three-judge Bench comprising Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and K M Joseph.
9:04 AM, 14 Nov
A review petition had been filed challenging the clean chit given to the NDA government in the purchase of 36 fully loaded Rafale jets from France under the inter-governmental deal.
9:04 AM, 14 Nov
The court had observed that it is not its job to go into pricing when the need and quality of aircraft is not in doubt. Further the court also said it did not find anything wrong in the selection of the Indian offset partners by Dassault. All the pleas have been dismissed. The court also said that no further review is required, while also adding that no probe is required into the pricing aspect or decision making process for the purchase of the aircraft.
9:04 AM, 14 Nov
On the offset partner the Bench said that it is up to the vendor and not the central government to decide on the same. It is not for the court to step into what is appropriate. Mere press interviews cannot be the basis of the same. There is no commercial favouritism and hence there is no need to intervene.
9:04 AM, 14 Nov
On January 2, Sinha, Shourie and Bhushan had approached the court seeking review of the judgement, alleging that the court had relied upon "patently incorrect" claims made by the government in an unsigned note given in a sealed cover in the court.
9:03 AM, 14 Nov
The Centre had submitted that three privileged documents were unauthorisedly removed from the Defence Ministry and used by the petitioners to support their review petitions against the verdict which had dismissed all pleas challenging the procurement of the fighter jets.
9:03 AM, 14 Nov
The top court had rejected the objections raised by the Centre that those documents were not admissible as evidence under Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, and no one can produce them in court without the permission of the department concerned as they are also protected under the Official Secrets Act.
9:03 AM, 14 Nov
This would be the last major judgment to be delivered by CJI Ranjan Gogoi. He had delivered the landmark Ayodhya judgment on Saturday last. On Wednesday, he also led a Bench that held that the CJI’s office comes under the purview of the RTI Act subject to reasonable restrictions.
9:01 AM, 14 Nov
The Hindu in an article had cited internal documents and said that there were parallel discussions by the PMO on the deal. The report said that this weakened the negotiating positions by the Ministry of Defence and the negotiating team. The report also said that the deal became costlier for India as France refused to provide bank guarantees.
8:57 AM, 14 Nov
Venugopal said the application filed by Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and Prashant Bhushant, seeking from the court a review of its verdict dismissing pleas for a probe into against the Rafale deal, had annexed three documents which were photocopies of the original.
8:47 AM, 14 Nov
There was a full blown controversy over these documents, with the Centre represented by Attorney General K K Venugopal saying that these documents were stolen. However later on he claimed that the Rafale documents were not stolen from the Defence Ministry and that what he meant in his submission before the Supreme Court was that petitioners in the application used "photocopies of the original" papers, deemed secret by the government
READ MORE
1:05 PM, 13 Nov
The court had also noted that no law enacted by Parliament specifically barring or prohibiting the publication of such documents on any of the grounds mentioned in Article 19(2) of the Constitution has been brought to its notice.
1:06 PM, 13 Nov
It had said the documents used in the pleas were published in The Hindu' in February and one of the papers was also published by The Wire'.
1:07 PM, 13 Nov
It had noted that all the three documents were in "public domain" and published by prominent daily The Hindu were "in consonance with the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech".
1:29 PM, 13 Nov
The top court had rejected the objections raised by the Centre that those documents were not admissible as evidence under Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, and no one can produce them in court without the permission of the department concerned as they are also protected under the Official Secrets Act.
1:49 PM, 13 Nov
In a setback to the Centre, the apex court on April 10 allowed the pleas which relied on leaked documents for seeking review of its Rafale judgement and dismissed the government's preliminary objections claiming "privilege" over them.
2:09 PM, 13 Nov
The Centre had submitted that three privileged documents were unauthorisedly removed from the Defence Ministry and used by the petitioners to support their review petitions against the verdict which had dismissed all pleas challenging the procurement of the fighter jets.
2:30 PM, 13 Nov
On January 2, Sinha, Shourie and Bhushan had approached the Supreme Court seeking review of the judgement, alleging that the court had relied upon "patently incorrect" claims made by the government in an unsigned note given in a sealed cover in the court.
2:51 PM, 13 Nov
The top court had said there was no substantial evidence of commercial favouritism to any private entity.
3:11 PM, 13 Nov
In the verdict, the court said there was no occasion to doubt the decision-making process in the procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets from France and dismissed all the petitions seeking an investigation into alleged irregularities in the Rs 58,000 crore deal.
3:31 PM, 13 Nov
Besides the trio, AAP leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh has also filed a separate review petition in the case.
6:32 PM, 13 Nov
The Rafale case: In 2015, India announced that it had conveyed to France that it would acquire 36 Rafale jet in fly-away condition.
7:29 PM, 13 Nov
India and France concluded an Inter-Governmental Agreement for the supply of the aircraft.
9:25 PM, 13 Nov
The negotiation for Rafale was first started by the Congress-led UPA but it could not conclude the deal as both the parties were yet to agree on a number of issues.
10:09 PM, 13 Nov
The Congress claimed that price at which Rafale was being bought was way higher than what it had negotiated with France.
11:30 PM, 13 Nov
It said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi bypassed the Cabinet Committee on Security and pushed the deal through his office PMO.
7:59 AM, 14 Nov
The Supreme Court would also deliver its verdict in a contempt plea filed against Rahul Gandhi. The court had said earlier that its Rafale judgment "had no occasion" to make any such comments ascribed to it by Rahul Gandhi. The judgment was solely on a legal question about admissibility as evidence certain documents objected to by the AG, the court also said.
8:00 AM, 14 Nov
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Meenakshi Lekhi, told the bench that the Congress president reportedly made a remark that the "Supreme Court said chowkidaar chor hai (The watchman is a thief)," in the verdict.
8:28 AM, 14 Nov
It may be recalled that when the review was filed the petitioners, Arun Shourie, Yashwant Sinha and Prashant Bhushan had submitted fresh documents before the court. The Centre had then pleaded that these documents were unauthorisedly photo-copied from defence files and that these would have an inimical impact on national security and also friendly relations with France.
8:47 AM, 14 Nov
There was a full blown controversy over these documents, with the Centre represented by Attorney General K K Venugopal saying that these documents were stolen. However later on he claimed that the Rafale documents were not stolen from the Defence Ministry and that what he meant in his submission before the Supreme Court was that petitioners in the application used "photocopies of the original" papers, deemed secret by the government
8:57 AM, 14 Nov
Venugopal said the application filed by Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and Prashant Bhushant, seeking from the court a review of its verdict dismissing pleas for a probe into against the Rafale deal, had annexed three documents which were photocopies of the original.
9:01 AM, 14 Nov
The Hindu in an article had cited internal documents and said that there were parallel discussions by the PMO on the deal. The report said that this weakened the negotiating positions by the Ministry of Defence and the negotiating team. The report also said that the deal became costlier for India as France refused to provide bank guarantees.
9:03 AM, 14 Nov
This would be the last major judgment to be delivered by CJI Ranjan Gogoi. He had delivered the landmark Ayodhya judgment on Saturday last. On Wednesday, he also led a Bench that held that the CJI’s office comes under the purview of the RTI Act subject to reasonable restrictions.
9:03 AM, 14 Nov
The top court had rejected the objections raised by the Centre that those documents were not admissible as evidence under Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, and no one can produce them in court without the permission of the department concerned as they are also protected under the Official Secrets Act.
9:03 AM, 14 Nov
The Centre had submitted that three privileged documents were unauthorisedly removed from the Defence Ministry and used by the petitioners to support their review petitions against the verdict which had dismissed all pleas challenging the procurement of the fighter jets.
9:04 AM, 14 Nov
On January 2, Sinha, Shourie and Bhushan had approached the court seeking review of the judgement, alleging that the court had relied upon "patently incorrect" claims made by the government in an unsigned note given in a sealed cover in the court.
9:04 AM, 14 Nov
On the offset partner the Bench said that it is up to the vendor and not the central government to decide on the same. It is not for the court to step into what is appropriate. Mere press interviews cannot be the basis of the same. There is no commercial favouritism and hence there is no need to intervene.
9:04 AM, 14 Nov
The court had observed that it is not its job to go into pricing when the need and quality of aircraft is not in doubt. Further the court also said it did not find anything wrong in the selection of the Indian offset partners by Dassault. All the pleas have been dismissed. The court also said that no further review is required, while also adding that no probe is required into the pricing aspect or decision making process for the purchase of the aircraft.
9:04 AM, 14 Nov
A review petition had been filed challenging the clean chit given to the NDA government in the purchase of 36 fully loaded Rafale jets from France under the inter-governmental deal.
10:17 AM, 14 Nov
The verdict will be delivered by a three-judge Bench comprising Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and K M Joseph.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites and ad networks. Such third party cookies may track your use on Oneindia sites for better rendering. Our partners use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on Oneindia website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn more
Click it and Unblock the Notifications
Table Tennis: Teen sensation Hansini makes big strides, to play maiden international event in Sweden 
Shivarajkumar Completes 34 Years In The Film Industry; Opens Up About His Journey 
Sony Xperia 9 Leak Suggests Presence Of Triple Rear Cameras 
10 Natural Ways To Prevent Mosquito Bites 
Royal Enfield Electra 350 Modified By Ornithopter Moto Design: Renamed KARGIL 
Indian Railways To Offer More Tatkal Train Tickets For A Longer Duration Now 
8 Most Appealing Summer Holiday Destinations In India 
CBSE Exam Centre Locator App: Why Class 10 & 12 Students Should Download? 
