The agency, which is probing the entire gamut of coal block allocation from 1993 onwards, is expected to register more cases before October 29 when it would be submitting its status report before the Supreme Court.
After registering 14 FIRs, the CBI is still probing three preliminary enquiries--for allocation of coal blocks between 1993-2004, 2006-09 and awarding of contracts for formation of joint ventures by government companies under the 'Government Dispensation Category' from 1993 onwards.
Highly placed sources in the agency said that Parakh was examined before registering a case against Hindalco during which he was asked about the reasons for reversing the decision to reject the company's application.
The sources claimed that Parakh could not explain under what circumstances he changed his own "considered" view and allowed Hindalco to get a pie in Talabira II and III coal blocks in Odisha which were allocated to PSUs--Mahanadi Coalfields and Neyveli Lignite and hence his name was included in the FIR.
Parakh has held that there was nothing wrong with the decision as Hindalco was the first applicant and equally competent to get the coal block.
Parakh has held that there was nothing wrong with the decision.
The former bureaucrat, who has been praised by the CAG as whistleblower, had, however, contended that "... if there is a conspiracy, then there are different members in this conspiracy.
There is K M Birla who made the representation, he is one conspirator. I, who examined the case and made a recommendation, I can be another conspirator and the Prime Minister, who as the Coal Minister, took the final decision is the third conspirator."