No defamatory statement against Jaitley: Kejriwal tells HC
New Delhi, July 12: The Delhi High Court today framed issues against Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and other AAP leaders in a civil defamation suit filed by Union Minister Arun Jaitley, notwithstanding their claim they had not made any defamatory statements against him in the DDCA case.
The issues were framed by Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw against Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders after the CM's counsel denied the allegations and submitted that whatever was said against the Union Minister was in public domain and he has not said anything on his own.

Besides Kejriwal, other leaders Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai also stated that there is absolute denial on their part and they are opposing the Union Minister's plea.
The court then framed issues against all the six AAP leaders and fixed the matter for September 27 before Joint Registrar to decide whether any defamatory statements were made by them. In a civil suit, when one party affirms and other party denies a material proposition of fact or law, then only issues arise.
Some of the issues framed by the court include whether Jaitley is entitled for any damage for the alleged defamatory statements made by AAP leaders and what should be the amount. "Whether the statements which are in public domain are actionable or not," the court said in one of its issues.
During the hearing, the judge objected to the statements made by senior advocate H S Phoolka, appearing for one of the AAP leaders, that the court is giving special treatment to this suit. The judge said the senior advocate should sit in the court room and observe whether any special treatment is given in any of the matters and how the bench is proceeding. "Such arguments are to be condemned," he observed.
Senior advocate Sandeep Sethi, Pratibha M Singh and Rajiv Nayar opposed AAP leaders' contentions saying they were contrary to their pleadings as they have admitted to making defamatory remarks in their written statement.
After the issues were framed and the matter was sent to Joint Registrar for further proceedings, Jaitley's counsel urged the court to appoint local commissioner for speedy disposal of the matter.
Jaitley's contention was opposed by AAP leaders who did not give their consent to appointment of local commissioner.
Jaitley, who has already denied all the allegations of financial bungling, had filed the suit seeking Rs 10 crore damages against the backdrop of attacks on him by Kejriwal and other AAP leaders over alleged irregularities and financial bungling in DDCA of which he was the president for about 13 years till 2013.
The Union minister has filed a criminal defamation complaint in a Delhi court on the same issue. The DDCA has also filed a criminal defamation suit against Kejriwal and suspended BJP MP Kirti Azad.
PTI
-
Bangalore Gold Silver Rate Today, March 9, 2026: Gold and Silver Prices Fall as US Dollar Strengthens -
Vijay-NDA Alliance On Cards? Pawan Kalyan Reportedly Reaches Out to TVK Chief -
Who Was Mojtaba Khamenei’s Wife Zahra Haddad-Adel and What Do We Know About Her? -
Who Is Aditi Hundia? Viral ‘Girl in Red’ & Ishan Kishan's Girlfriend Spotted During IND vs NZ Final -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 9 March 2026: Latest 24K, 22K Gold And Silver Rates In City -
Kerala Election 2026 Date: When Can You Expect EC To Announce Key Dates of Voting & Counting? -
Chennai MRTS Velachery–St Thomas Mount Line Opening on March 10 Faces Delay; Direct Beach Route to Start Later -
Mumbai Water Supply Cut For 24 Hours: Check Dates, Timings & Areas Affected by BMC Maintenance Disruption -
Hardik Pandya and Girlfriend Mahieka Sharma’s Celebration Video Goes Viral After India’s Win -
Bengaluru Hotels to Shut From Tomorrow March 10 as Commercial LPG Supply Stops -
Trisha's Net Worth: How Rich Is Thalapathy Vijay's Rumoured Girlfriend? -
Pune Electrician Arrested After Viral Video Shows Him Raising ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ Slogans, Watch












Click it and Unblock the Notifications