Kejriwal Questions PM Modi's Silence After Reported Deaths of Three Indian Sailors in Gulf

The reported death of three Indian sailors during American action against commercial vessels in the Gulf region has triggered a political confrontation in India, with opposition parties questioning both Washington's conduct and New Delhi's public response. Aam Aadmi Party national convener and former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal has sharply criticised US President Donald Trump and asked why Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not spoken publicly on the deaths.

Kejriwal, writing on X, said those responsible for the loss of Indian lives must be held accountable. He alleged that Indian nationals were present on vessels targeted by the United States on different days in the Gulf region. According to him, 68 Indians were aboard various ships affected by the action, and three of them died.

The issue has widened into a larger debate on the safety of Indian seafarers, India's diplomatic posture and the tone of American communication after the incident. Opposition parties have accused the Centre of not reacting strongly enough in public, while the government has taken up the matter through diplomatic channels.

Donald Trump, you will be held accountable for the Indian lives lost. You are a cowardly, cold-blooded murderer.

It is unfortunate that PM Modi remains silent, but soon, India will have a strong Prime Minister who will make you pay for your misdeeds. pic.twitter.com/MkRNZT7wzi

— Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal) June 15, 2026

Kejriwal targets Trump, questions Modi's silence

Kejriwal used unusually strong language against Trump and said India would one day seek an account for the deaths of its citizens. He argued that the matter was too serious to be handled only through quiet diplomacy, especially when Indian families had lost their loved ones at sea.

The AAP leader also questioned Prime Minister Modi's silence, saying the country expected a clear message from the government. He claimed there was anger among citizens and that India should make its position unmistakable when its nationals are killed in such circumstances.

His remarks have added a sharper political edge to an issue that involves maritime security, energy trade and India-US relations. The Gulf region is a sensitive zone for global shipping, and any military action involving commercial vessels can have wider consequences for countries dependent on sea routes.

Jaishankar raises India's objection with Marco Rubio

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has spoken to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and conveyed India's strong objection over the incident. Jaishankar said lethal action against commercial vessels was not acceptable and that India was treating the matter with seriousness.

India's objection centres on the reported targeting of ships engaged in commercial activity and the presence of Indian sailors on board. Indian seafarers work in large numbers on international shipping routes, including in high-risk zones. Their safety is a recurring concern for the government during maritime crises.

The diplomatic exchange became more contentious after the US State Department released its account of the conversation. According to that statement, commercial ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz would have to comply with instructions from US forces. It also said violations of the US blockade and illegal transport of Iranian oil would not be tolerated.

Opposition leaders objected to the tone of the American statement. They argued that it sounded more like a warning than an expression of concern over the deaths of Indian citizens. The absence of a visible public apology or condolence from the American side has further intensified criticism.

Congress joins attack on government response

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge also criticised Prime Minister Modi, saying the country had been waiting for a response after the deaths of three Indian sailors. He alleged that India's global standing and strategic autonomy appeared to be weakening.

Kharge said the safety of Indian citizens abroad must remain central to foreign policy. His remarks reflected a broader opposition argument that India should not appear hesitant when dealing with even a close strategic partner if Indian lives are involved.

Congress leader Manish Tewari also questioned Rubio's language, describing it as harsh and confrontational. He said such a tone was not normal in communication between friendly countries. The criticism suggests the opposition will continue to press the government for a stronger public line.

The government, however, appears to be handling the matter through diplomatic engagement for now. In such cases, official responses often balance public sentiment with strategic considerations, especially when relations involve defence, trade, energy and security cooperation.

Why the Strait of Hormuz is crucial

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most important maritime passages. A large share of oil and gas exports from the Gulf passes through this narrow waterway before reaching markets across Asia, Europe and other regions. Any disruption there can affect global energy prices and shipping schedules.

For India, the area is especially important because the country depends heavily on imported crude oil and liquefied natural gas. Indian shipping companies, energy importers and seafarers have direct exposure to developments in the region. Military tensions there can quickly become an economic and diplomatic concern for New Delhi.

Commercial vessels in the Gulf often operate in a complex environment shaped by sanctions, naval patrols, regional rivalries and energy trade. This makes the safety of crews a critical issue. When Indian sailors are affected, the incident moves beyond foreign policy and becomes a domestic political matter.

The deaths have now raised questions about accountability, rules of engagement and communication between India and the United States. The opposition is demanding a more assertive stance, while the government's next steps are likely to determine how firmly the issue remains in public debate.

For now, the case has turned a maritime security incident into a test of diplomacy. The immediate concern remains the loss of three Indian lives, but the wider issue is how India protects its citizens working on global sea routes during periods of military tension.